Haryana

Ambala

CC/159/2020

Pawandeep Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Zomato Zamota Media Pvt Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

11 Nov 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                Complaint case no.         :    159 of 2020.

                                                Date of Institution           :     27.08.2020.

                                                Date of decision    :     11.11.2022.

 

Pawandeep Singh aged about 32 years son of Shri Sukhpal Singh, R/o H.No.54-55, Lal Kurti Bazar, Ambala Cantt. Pincode-133 001

          ……. Complainant.

                                                Versus

 

     1.  Zomato Zomoto Media Private Limited, Vipul Tech Square Golf, Course Road,   D.L.F Phase V, Sector-43, Gurugram (Gurgaon) Haryana, Pincode-122 009,        through its Authorized Signatory.

     2.  Shri Yogesh Kumar, Recipient of Order, Zamato Branch Ambala Cantt, Second   Floor, SCO No.03, Above Oriental Bank of Commerce-3, Prem Nagar, Ambala,      Pincode-134 003.

     3.  Pyramid Café Lounge, Hotel Puran Palace, 167, Vijay Rattan Chowk, Ambala     Cantt, Haryana-133 001, through its Authorized Signatory.

     4.  Singh Chicken (Veg./Non.Veg), Shop No.10, Opposite Rama Petrol Pump.         Jagadhri Road, Ambala Cantt, through its’ Authorized Signatory. 

 

                                                                                  ….…. Opposite Parties.      

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member,

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.         

                            

Present:       None for the complainant.

          Shri J.S.Dhaliwal, Advocate, counsel for the OP No.1.

          Shri J.S. Bajwa, Advocate, counsel for the OP No.2

          OP No.3 already ex parte.

          Defence of OP No.4 already struck of.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order:-       Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to deposit of costs of Rs.400/-, in the legal aid account of this Commission, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that even from the last two dates of hearing i.e. 27.10.2022 and 19.10.2022, none appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties concerned free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced:-11.11.2022.

 

Member                                    Member                                    President

                     DCDRC, Ambala

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.