Andhra Pradesh

Kurnool

CC/24/2009

G.Suryanarayana Setty, S/o. Late G.Allaiah Setty - Complainant(s)

Versus

Yemminganur Municipality, Represented by its Commissioner - Opp.Party(s)

N.Ramachandra

26 May 2009

ORDER

Heading1
Heading2
 
Complaint Case No. CC/24/2009
 
1. G.Suryanarayana Setty, S/o. Late G.Allaiah Setty
R/o.H.No.5/381, B.S.Colony, Yemminganur, Kurnool District-518360
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Yemminganur Municipality, Represented by its Commissioner
D.No.642/1, Near Somappa Circle, Yemminganur, Kurnool District-518360
Kurnool
Andhra Pradesh
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt.C.Preethi, M.A., L.L.B., PRESIDING MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

Cond.,

1

BEFORE THE DISTRICT FORUM:KURNOOL

Present: Sri.K.V.H. Prasad, B.A., LL.B President

And

Smt. C.Preethi, M.A.LL.B., Lady Member

And

Sri. M.Krishna Reddy, M.Sc.,M.Phil., Male Member

Tuesday the 26th day of May, 2009

C.C.No. 24/2009

Between:

 

G.Suryanarayana Setty, S/o. Late G.Allaiah Setty,

R/o.H.No.5/381, B.S.Colony, Yemminganur, Kurnool District-518360.                  

                                                                                  

                                                 … Complainant

Versus

Yemminganur Municipality, Represented by its Commissioner,

D.No.642/1, Near Somappa Circle, Yemminganur, Kurnool District-518360.

 

… Opposite party

 

This complaint is coming on this day for orders in the

presence of Sri. N.Ramachandra, Advocate, for the complainant, and Sri.

N.Mallikharjun, Advocate, for the opposite party, upon perusing the

material papers on record, the Forum made the following.

ORDER

(As per Smt. C.Preethi, Lady Member

C.C.No.24/2009

1. This consumer complaint of the complainant is filed U/S 12 of

C.P.Act, 1986, seeking direction on the opposite party to refund

Rs.19,161/- interest paid on tax of Rs.63,003/-, Rs.5,000/- a s

compensation, cost of the complaint and any other relief and relief’s

which the complainant is entitled.

2. The brief facts of the complainants case is that complainant paid

house tax for the period, 2005-06,2006-07,and 2007-08 amounting to

Cond.,

2

Rs.63,003/- and penalty or interest of Rs. 19,161/- totally Rs.82,164/-

under protest in February,2008. The Government issued a G.O.

M.S.No.238 dt.15-03-2008, waiving interest or penalty to those who

paid arrears as one time measure before to 31-03-2008. The deadline

fixed by the Government was complied by the complainant and the

complainant approached opposite party either to refund the interest or

to adjust in future payment of tax as there was no response from the

opposite party, the complainant got issued legal notice but it was in

vain and approached the forum for reliefs.

3. In pursuance to the notice of this forum as to this case of the

complainant, the opposite party appeared through their standing

counsel and contested the case by filing written version.

4. The written version of opposite parties denies the complaint as

not maintainable under law or on fact, but admits the complainant paid

house tax of Rs.63,003/- and penalty of Rs.19,161/- totally

Rs.82,164/-. It also submits that G.O.M.S. No. 238 dated 15-03-2008

was issued to vaive the interest on arrears of property tax and interest

on current year due on property tax i.e. 2007-08 before to 31-03-

2008, but the complainant paid the arrears and interest in the month

of February,2008, and the G.O. is silent with regard to payments

made before to 15-03-2008. The benefits of G.O. are not

retrospective effect but only prospective effect from 15-03-2008 only

and the complainant is not entitled to claim interest waiver and seeks

for the dismissal of case with costs.

5. In support of his case the complainant relied on the following

documents viz., (1) letter dated 27-03-2008 of complainant to opposite

party along with statement mentioned in the said letter and

acknowledgement (2) office copy of legal notice dated 12-11-208 along

with postal receipts and acknowledgement and (3) a bunch of ten

property tax receipts, besides to the sworn affidavit of the complainant in

reiteration of his complainant averments and the above documents are

marked as Ex.A1 to A3 for its appreciation in this case. The opposite

parties in support of their case did neither filed his sworn affidavit nor any

documents.

Cond.,

3

6. Hence, the point for consideration is to what relief the

complainant is entitled to alleging deficiency of service on part of opposite

parties?

7. It is the case of the complainant he paid house tax arrears

amounting to Rs.63,003/- and penalty of Rs.19,161/- totally Rs. 82,164/-

for the year 2005-06, 2006-07 and 2007-08 in Feburary,2008. As per

the G.O.M.S.No. 238 dated 15-03-2008 issued by the Government

interest is waived to those who pay arrears and the current tax as one

time measure before to 31-03-2008 and the complainant submits that as

he paid the arrears and penalty in February, 2008 it self, and he complied

the dead line fixed by the Government and he is entitled to waiver of

penalty.

8. On the other side the opposite party in their written version

averments submits that admittedly the complainant paid house tax of

Rs.63,003/- and penalty of Rs.19,161/- in February, 2008 i.e. before to

the issual of G.O.M.S.No.238/- dt.15-03-2008 and hence the complainant

is not entitled to waiver of interest.

9. As per the G.O.M.S.No.238 dated 15-03-2008, the interest is

waived on the arrears of property tax and interest on current year dues

on property tax i.e. 2007-2008 as one time measure. The complainant in

this case paid arrears for the years 2005-06, 2006-07, and 2007-08

Rs.63,003/- and interest of Rs.19,161/- in February, 2008 as per the

above G.O. interest is waived and the complainant is certainly entitled for

refund of interest paid. The opposite party submits that the G.O. is

silent with regard to payments made before to 15-03-2008, when the

G.O. is silent, it is admitted fact that who ever pays the arrears on or

before the date of issual of G.O. is entitled to the benefits of the above

said G.O.

10. Hence, the complainant is certainly remaining entitled for refund

of interest of Rs.19,161/- paid on house tax of Rs. 63,003/-. The

opposite party by his deficient conduct is not refunding the interest

amount to the complainant ensured mental agony to the complainant

Cond.,

4

and the opposite party is liable to pay amount of Rs.2,000/- a s

compensation for mental agony and Rs.1,000/- as costs of the case.

 

11. In the result, the complainant is allowed directing the opposite

party to refund to the complainant the amount collected under interest

/penality i.e. Rs.19,161/- along with compensation of Rs.2,000/- and

costs of Rs.1,000/- with in one month from the date of receipt of this

order. In default, the opposite party shall pay the above amount with

12% interest from the date of default till realization.

Typed to dictation, corrected and pronounced on this 26th day of May,

2009.

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

LADY MEMBER MALE MEMBER PRESIDENT

APPENDIX OF EVIDENCE

Witnesses Examined

For the complainant :Nil For the opposite parties :Nil

List of exhibits marked for the complainant:-

Ex.A1. Letter dt.27-03-08 of complainant to the OP along with

ack.and Statement.

Ex.A2. Office copy of legal notice dt.12-11-2008 along with postal

receipt & ack.

Ex.A3. A bunch of 10 property tax receipts.

List of exhibits marked for the opposite parties: NIL

Sd/- Sd/- Sd/-

LADY MEMBER MALE MEMABER PRESIDENT

// Certified free copy communicated under Rule 4 (10) of the

A.P.S.C.D.R.C. Rules, 1987//

Cond.,

5

Copy to:-

Complainant and Opposite parties

Copy was made ready on :

Copy was dispatched on :

 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt.C.Preethi, M.A., L.L.B.,]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.