Haryana

StateCommission

A/1271/2018

UHBVNL - Complainant(s)

Versus

YASHPAL CHOPRA - Opp.Party(s)

ANIL KUMAR GARG

29 Mar 2019

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                                                             

 

First Appeal No.     :     1271 of 2018     

                                                Date of Institution    :   21.11.2018

                                                Date of Decision              :    29.03.2019

 

 

 

1.      UHBVNL through its SDO Operation, Sub Division, Model Town, UHBVNL, Yamuna Nagar, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar.

 

2.      XEN UHBVNL, Yamuna Nagar, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar.

 

3.      SE UHBVNL, Yamuna Nagar, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar.

                                      Appellants-Opposite Parties

 

 

Versus

 

Yashpal Chopra son of Sh. Khazan Chand, resident of House No.3, Professor Colony, Yamuna Nagar, Tehsil Jagadhari, District Yamuna Nagar.

Respondent-Complainant

 

 

 

CORAM:             Hon’ble Mr. Justice T.P.S. Mann, President.

                             Shri Diwan Singh Chauhan, Member                      

 

 

Present:               Shri Sikander Bakshi, Advocate for the appellants.

                             Shri Charanjit Singh, Authorized Representative of the respondent.

 

 

                                                   O R D E R

 

T.P.S. MANN J.(ORAL)

 

          At the outset, Shri Charanjit Singh, authorized agent of the respondent has placed on record the signed statement made by respondent Yashpal Chopra where it has been stated that he had entered into compromise with the appellant and deposited an amount of Rs.40,681/- with the office of SDO, Model Town, UHBVNL, Yamuna Nagar vide CRR No.230, Page No.109, Serial No.74 dated 31.01.2019 in terms of the compromise dated 30.01.2019.  Further there is nothing due against him in respect of the amount in question.

2.      Learned counsel for the appellant states that the matter has been amicably settled by the parties and in pursuance of the settlement, the respondent had deposited the amount of Rs.40,681/-.   He states that in view of the same, he may be allowed to withdraw the appeal.

3.      The documents in relation to the settlement have been taken on record.

4.      Dismissed as withdrawn.

 

 

Announced 29.03.2019

(Diwan Singh Chauhan) Member

(T.P.S. Mann) President

UK