Andhra Pradesh

StateCommission

fa/848/2011

HDFC BANK Limited, Rep.by its Manager Bahadar Road, Vijayawada,rep.by its Legal Manager Mr. A. Raja - Complainant(s)

Versus

Yarlagadda Krishna Murthy, S/o Sitharamaiah, Occ:business, - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. P. Prasad

04 Feb 2013

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. fa/848/2011
(Arisen out of Order Dated 10/08/2011 in Case No. cc/252/2010 of District Krishna at Vijaywada)
 
1. HDFC BANK Limited, Rep.by its Manager Bahadar Road, Vijayawada,rep.by its Legal Manager Mr. A. Raja
Hyderabad.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Yarlagadda Krishna Murthy, S/o Sitharamaiah, Occ:business,
C/o Sri Krishna Estates, Prakasam Road, Governerpet, Vijayawada-2
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO PRESIDING MEMBER
 HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

BEFORE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD

F.A.No.848 OF 2011 AGAINST C.C.NO.252 OF 2010 DISTRICT FORUM-II VIJAYAWADA AT KRISHNA DISTRICT

Between:

                                       HDFC Bank Limited
rep. by its Manager (Car Loans)
Legal Manager,

                                                                                                                       

                       

 

Yarlagadda S/o C/o Sri Krishna Estates

                                                

Counsel for the Appellant                     Counsel for the Respondent 

QUORUM:  

                       SRI THOTA ASHOK KUMAR, HON’BLE MEMBER

 

 MONDAY THE FOURTH  

  

 

Oral Order (As per Sri                                        

1.    2.            hat the complainant purchased Mercedes Benz car from M/s took delivery of the vehicle on 03-04-2008.     `14 lakhs as also six monthly instalments.    

3.     `37 `37,43,839/- and thereafter by filing original petition before III    

4.            

5.    `15 lakh with interest @ 9% p.a. from the date of filing the complaint and costs of`2,000/-.

6.            

7.    

8.    `40 lakhs from the opposite party. `40 lakhs to the The complainant paid balance amount to a tune of`14 lakhs as also six monthly instalments. The complainant         

9.             

10.             

“Dissatisfied with the order of State Commission, the petitioner has     

 

11.           

”The respondent No.1 had concealed from the  

 

12.           

13.              

The remedy of arbitration is not the only remedy available to a grower. Rather, it is an optional remedy. He can

 

14.                 `10 lakhs though found support from the record, it cannot be held that this commission can interfere with the juridical aspect of arbitration tribunal. 

15.           In the result, the appeal is allowed setting aside the order of the District Forum. n the event the 

 

 

 

                                                                             

 

                                                                                                                                                        KMK*

                                                                                                                       

 
 
[HONABLE MR. SRI R. LAXMI NARASIMHA RAO]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HONABLE MR. T.Ashok Kumar]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.