Haryana

Karnal

CC/67/2018

Sunil Dutt Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

Xiaomi (MT) Technology India Private Limited - Opp.Party(s)

S.D. Sharma

10 Jul 2018

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KARNAL.

                                                                Complaint No.67 of 2018

                                                             Date of instt.: 15.03.2018

                                                                Date of decision 10.07.2018

Sunil Dutt Sharma son of Shri Sulekh Chand Sharma, resident of House no.338, Gali no.6,7, Gandhi Nagar, Karnal.

…………..Complainant.

                             Versus

1.Xiaomi (MI) Technology India Private Limited 8^th floor, Tower-1, Umiya Business Bay, Marathahalli- Sarajpur, Outer Ring, Road, Bangalore, Karnatka-560103.

2. TVS Electronics Limited, C/o DHL, 4^th Floor, plot no.193-197 & 254-258, 137 & 248-249, Jigani Link Road, Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bangalore-562106.

3. JMD Communications, SCO no.22, 1^st floor, Mugal Canal, Karnal, Haryana-132001.

 

                                                                                ………… Opposite Parties.

                     Complaint u/s 12  of the Consumer Protection Act.

Before:          Sh.Jagmal Singh……….President

                        Sh.Anil Sharma…….Member.

 

Present:          Complainant in person.

                          Shri Dheeraj Sachdeva Advocate for OP no.1.

                          OP no.2 given up.

                          Shri Amit Sachdeva Advocate for OP no.3.

ORDER:

                     File taken up today on the application moved by complainant. The Learned counsel for OP no.1 made statement that OPs are ready to repair the mobile set of the complainant free of costs subject to deposit the same at the service center Karnal within 10 days from today.

                   Thereafter, learned counsel for the complainant made statement for withdrawal of the complaint by submitting that having regard to the statement of the learned counsel for the OP no.1, he does not want to pursue with the present complaint. Statements of both the parties recorded separately.

                   In view of the statement of learned counsel for complainant the present complaint is dismissed as withdrawn. However, both the parties shall be bound by their respective statements. The parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and the file be consigned to the record room after due compliance.         

Announced
Dated:10.07.2018

                                                                         

                                                                             President,

                                                                   District Consumer Disputes

                                                                    Redressal Forum, Karnal.

 

                            (Anil Sharma ) 

                                Member.