Delhi

West Delhi

CC/17/292

RAJ KUMAR - Complainant(s)

Versus

XIAMO TECHNOLOGY - Opp.Party(s)

05 Jan 2018

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER REDRESSAL FORUM-III (WEST)
C-BLOCK, COMMUNITY CENTRE,PANKHA ROAD, JANAK PURI, NEW DELHI
 
Complaint Case No. CC/17/292
 
1. RAJ KUMAR
C-4,TRANSLO LTD.RESIDENTIAL COLONY,TIMARPUR,DELHI-54
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. XIAMO TECHNOLOGY
G-5,2ND FLOOR,JANAK PLACE,CHATRAPATI DISTRICT CENTRE,JANAKPURI,DELHI-58
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MS. KIRAN KAUSHAL PRESIDING MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. PUNEET LAMBHA MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
Dated : 05 Jan 2018
Final Order / Judgement

Present :-          None for complainant.

                    Complaint passed over several times since morning. But none appeared for the complainant. It is already 03.00 P.M. No further wait is justified and possible. The complainant was not present on previous two dates for hearing also. It seems that the complainant is not interested in prosecution of complaint.

          Therefore, this Forum has no option except to dismiss the complaint in default for non-prosecution. Hence the complaint is dismissed in default for non prosecution.

       Copy of the order be sent to the parties as per rules. File be consigned.

 
 
[HON'BLE MS. KIRAN KAUSHAL]
PRESIDING MEMBER
 
[HON'BLE MRS. PUNEET LAMBHA]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.