Chandigarh

StateCommission

FA/193/2014

Kamaljit Kaur - Complainant(s)

Versus

Worldwide Immigration - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. Arun Singla Adv.

03 Jul 2014

ORDER

 
First Appeal No. FA/193/2014
(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/02/2014 in Case No. CC/703/2013 of District DF-I)
 
1. Kamaljit Kaur
UT
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Worldwide Immigration
Consultancy Services Limited(WWICSLtd.) having its Registered Office at DLF Centre, Mezzanine Floor, Savitri Cinema Commercial Complex, Greater Kailash-II, New Delhi India
2. Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services Limited having its Head office at A-12, Industrial Area, Phase-VI, Mohali, Punjab
through its Managing Director
3. Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services Limited(WWICS Ltd.) having its Branch office at SCO No. 2415-16, Sector-22/C, Chandigarh U.T. Through its
Branch Manager
4. Global Strategic Business Consultancy having its Head Office
at FZCO, Office No. 315-316, West Wing-3, Dubai Airport Free Zone, Dubai(UAE) through M/s Worldwide Immigration Consultancy Services Limited(WWICS Ltd.) having its Corporate Office at A-12, Industrial
Area, Phase-VI, Mohali, Punjab Through its
Managing Director
5. Sh. Raman Walia Adv. -----(Respondent)
HOuse No. 1513, Sector-18, Chandigarh
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.] PRESIDENT
  DEV RAJ MEMBER
  PADMA PANDEY MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

U.T.,CHANDIGARH

                                                         

First Appeal No.

:

193 of 2014

Date of Institution

:

23.5.2014

Date of Decision

 

3.7.2014

 

Kamaljit Kaur wife of Sh. Raminder Pal Singh, resident of House No.211, Street No.3, Ajit Nagar, Tehsil Sunam, District Sangrur, Punjab.

……Appellant--

V e r s u s

1]   

 

2]   

 

3]   

 

4]   Punjab

 Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

 

BEFORE:  

               

               

               

Argued by:

                   

PER JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT

1.             

2.               

3.                It was stated that, as per the requirement of the Opposite Parties,  New Delhi. It was further stated that as per the agreement, and, on demand of the Opposite Parties, the complainant deposited another sum of US$700 in the name of Global Strategic Business Consultancy (Opposite Party No.4), which was paid to Opposite Parties No. 1 to 3 Company atPatiala.  

4.              Canada 

5.                

6.       In their joint reply, Opposite parties No.1 to 4, admitted that the Parties had entered into Contracts of Engagement vide Annexures R-2 & R-3 and they were bound by the terms and conditions of the same.  Canada. Dubai    

7.             

8.               

9.             

10.           

11.           Canada

12.          13.           

14.           

“3.

In consideration of the company’s professional services, the client agrees and undertakes to pay the company a non-refundable sum of Rs.30,000(Rupees Thirty Thousand only) 

 

15.              

16.          

 

“Refund

7.        The Company undertakes to provide full refund to the client of the professional fee paid by the client to the Company excluding processing fee levied by the processing Visa Office and other expenses incurred by the client in the event the Visa Officer rejects client’s case and the Company is unable to revert such decision by any means which may include Judicial Review process. 

 
 
[ JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER [RETD.]]
PRESIDENT
 
[ DEV RAJ]
MEMBER
 
[ PADMA PANDEY]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.