STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,
U.T.,CHANDIGARH
First Appeal No. | : | 193 of 2014 |
Date of Institution | : | 23.5.2014 |
Date of Decision | | 3.7.2014 |
Kamaljit Kaur wife of Sh. Raminder Pal Singh, resident of House No.211, Street No.3, Ajit Nagar, Tehsil Sunam, District Sangrur, Punjab.
……Appellant--
V e r s u s
1]
2]
3]
4] Punjab
Appeal under Section 15 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986.
BEFORE:
Argued by:
PER JUSTICE SHAM SUNDER (RETD.), PRESIDENT
1.
2.
3. It was stated that, as per the requirement of the Opposite Parties, New Delhi. It was further stated that as per the agreement, and, on demand of the Opposite Parties, the complainant deposited another sum of US$700 in the name of Global Strategic Business Consultancy (Opposite Party No.4), which was paid to Opposite Parties No. 1 to 3 Company atPatiala.
4. Canada
5.
6. In their joint reply, Opposite parties No.1 to 4, admitted that the Parties had entered into Contracts of Engagement vide Annexures R-2 & R-3 and they were bound by the terms and conditions of the same. Canada. Dubai
7.
8.
9.
10.
11. Canada
12. 13.
14.
“3.
In consideration of the company’s professional services, the client agrees and undertakes to pay the company a non-refundable sum of Rs.30,000(Rupees Thirty Thousand only)
15.
16.
“Refund
7. The Company undertakes to provide full refund to the client of the professional fee paid by the client to the Company excluding processing fee levied by the processing Visa Office and other expenses incurred by the client in the event the Visa Officer rejects client’s case and the Company is unable to revert such decision by any means which may include Judicial Review process.