Kerala

Kottayam

CC/278/2021

Gautham N Nair - Complainant(s)

Versus

Wood Land Foot Wear - Opp.Party(s)

30 Sep 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/278/2021
( Date of Filing : 20 Nov 2021 )
 
1. Gautham N Nair
Kunnampallil House, Devalokam P O Kottayam. Pin.686004
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Wood Land Foot Wear
Sastri Road, Kottayam. Pin.686002
Kottayam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 30 Sep 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated, the 30th day of September, 2022.

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Smt. Bindhu R.  Member

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 278/2021 (Filed on 20/01/2021)

 

Petitioner                                            :         Goutham N. Nair,

                                                                   Kunnampallil House,

                                                                   Devalokam P.O.

                                                                   Kottayam – 686004.

 

                                                                             Vs.

Opposite parties                                 :         Wood land Foot Wears

                                                                   (Bakerhill) Sastri Road,

                                                                   Kottayam – 686002.

                                               

                                                                  

O  R  D  E  R

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          This is a complaint filed under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service.  After admitting the complaint, the notice was served to the opposite party.  But opposite party failed to appear before the Commission and to file version.  Hence opposite party set exparte since 17-06-2022, the case is posted for the evidence of the complainant.  When the case is came up for consideration today, it is noticed that the complainant is continuously absent from the proceedings of the complaint.  Inspite of receipt of notice from this Commission, the complainant did not care to appear before the Commission and to adduce any evidence.  In the above circumstances we found that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with the complaint.  In view of the above discussion, we are of the opinion that this is a fit case to be dismissal for default.  In the result, the complaint is dismissed.

    Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 30th day of September, 2022

Sri. Manulal V.S. President             Sd/-

Smt. Bindhu R.  Member                 Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                  Sd/-

 

                                                                             By Order

 

                                                                              Assistant Registrar

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.