View 564 Cases Against Whirlpool
Ruma Chatterjee Patra filed a consumer case on 12 Nov 2024 against Whirlpool Bankura Service Centre in the Bankura Consumer Court. The case no is CC/100/2023 and the judgment uploaded on 13 Nov 2024.
IN THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, BANKURA
Consumer Complaint No.100/2023
Date of Filing: 03/11/2023
Before:
1. Samiran Dutta Ld. President
2. Siddhartha Sankar Bhui Ld. Member
3. Kabita Acharjee (Goswami) Ld. Member
For the Complainant: Self
For the O.P.2 & 3: Ld. Advocate Jayanta Kumar Mukhopadhyay
Complainant:
Ruma Chatterjee Patra,W/O-Utpal Patra,C/O-Mukul Biswas,Indaragora Hareswar Mela,Bankura,P.S-Bankura,Dist-Bankura,Pin-722101,Mob-8902258115
Opposite Party:
FINAL ORDER / JUDGEMENT
Order No.12
Dated:12-11-2024
No step is taken by the Complainant who is found absent on repeated call.
O.P. 2 & 3 files hazira through Advocate along with written argument.
It appears from the record that the Complainant has been directed to take step for adding the product seller but the product seller has not been brought on record. The Complainant is not however interested to proceed with the case. However, in view of Section 38(3)(c) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 the Commission proceeds to decide the case on merit in absence of the Complainant.
The Complainant’s case is that he purchased a double door Refrigerator of Whirlpool on 26/01/2018 from Khosla Electronics Pvt. Ltd., Kanchrapara showroom, North 24 Pgs. for Rs.22,500/- but in the Year-2022 the said Refrigerator generated technical problem for which O.P. NO.1 was approached for proper service and maintenance but of no avail. The Complainant has therefore approached this Commission for appropriate relief.
O.P.2 & 3 /Manufacturing Co. contested the case by filing a written version stated therein that the product seller is a necessary party in this case and that they being the Manufacturing co. has no liability in this case beyond the Warranty Period and without any manufacturing defect of the product.
Contd…..p/2
Page: 2
-: Decision with reasons:-
Having regard to the facts of the case, contention, submission, and documents on both sides the Commission finds that the Complainant purchased the Refrigerator on 26/01/2018 and after using the same for about four years without any problem she came forward with the plea of technical defect of the Refrigerator by approaching the local Whirlpool Service centre/ O.P.1. O.P. 2 & 3/Manufacturing Co. has no liability beyond the Warranty Period for service and maintenance of the product unless manufacturing defect is detected. Product seller i.e. Khosla Electronics Pvt. Ltd. has not been brought on record who is to account for proper service and maintenance of the product. O.P. NO.1/Local Service Centre is not liable for service and maintenance of the product beyond the Warranty Period subject to payment of requisite charges.
With this observation the case is disposed of by directing O.P. NO.1/Service Centre to render satisfactory service and maintenance of the Refrigerator in question on payment of requisite charges at the desire of the Complainant within three months time from this Order.
Both parties be supplied copy of this Order free of cost.
__________________ ________________ ________________
HON’BLE PRESIDENT HON’BLE MEMBER HON’BLE MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.