Delhi

East Delhi

CC/315/2021

AR SID ENTERPRISES LLP - Complainant(s)

Versus

WAVE MEGACITY CENTRE PVT. LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

PIYUSH SINGH

11 Feb 2022

ORDER

11.02.2022 –  315/2021

Through V.C.

Present:        Shri Piyush Singh Counsel for complainant

 Arguments heard. The query raised by this Forum is how the complaint is maintainable as the complainant has booked some commercial space with the OP. Counsel for complainant argued that this booking was for self-use and as such petition is maintainable. When confronted on the aspect as to whether the complaint falls within the exception with respect to the user of the said shop i.e. for self-purpose he further submitted that he has not pleaded so in the entire pleadings and further submitted that he be given permission to withdraw this matter as there is some technical defect with respect to pleadings.

I Heard and request is allowed.

The complaint is dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty to file the same if any.

File consigned to record room.

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.