Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/145/2017

Dr. D.S.A. Mahadevan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Volks Wageon India Pvt. Ltd.,Rep. by its Chairman & Managing Director & 2 Ors. - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. I.Jesu

07 Jun 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

            BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                Thiru.R.VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 FA. No. 145/2017

(Against the order in C.C. No. 185/2011, dated 20.11.2015, on the file of

District Consumer Forum, Chennai(North)

 

                                                            DATED THIS THE 7^TH  DAY OF JUNE 2022

 

Dr. D.S.A.Mahadevan,

Son of Authimoolam,

New No.12, AF Block,

8^th street, Anna Nagar,

Chennai 600 040                                              ..Appellant/complainant

                                                Vs

1.Volks Wageon India Private Limited,

Rep.by its Chairman/Managing Director,

Chakan Industrial Park,

Pune

 

2. M/s Abra Motors Private Ltd,

Rep.by its General Manager,

Rais Towers,

Plot No. 205-4B, 2^nd Avenue,

Anna Nagar, Chennai 600 040                

 

3. Volks Wageon India Private Limited,

No.3, North Avenue, Level ¾ ,

Maker Maxity, Bandra Kurla Complex,

Bandra (East) Mumbai 400 051                             ..Respondents/opposite parties  

 

Counsel for the Appellant/complainant             : M/s I.Jesu

Counsel for the 1^st Respondent/1^st op              : M/s A.R.Ramanathan

 

          This appeal is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :-

                                                       

                                                   Docket order

          No representation for both parties. This appeal is posted today for appearance of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. Today when the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the appellant was not present hence, passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the appellant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the appeal pending is of no use as the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The appeal is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

 

Sd/-                                                                                                           Sd/-

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                 R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT