Kerala

Kottayam

CC/65/2019

Githin George - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vodafone Idea Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

21 Jun 2022

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/65/2019
( Date of Filing : 13 May 2019 )
 
1. Githin George
Padinjattemuriyil House Pampady P O Kottayam
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Vodafone Idea Ltd
The Nodal Officer Vodafone Idea Ltd 4th Floor, Angels Arcade South Kalamassery Kochi
Eranakulam
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Jun 2022
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 21stday of June, 2022

 

Present:  Sri. Manulal V.S. President

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member

 

C C No. 65/2019 (filed on 13-05-2019)

 

Petitioner                                             :         Githin George,

                                                                      S/o. Georgekutty P.V.

                                                                      Painjattemuriyil House,

                                                                      Pampady P.O. Kottayam

                                                                      Pin – 686502.

                                                                                Vs.

Opposite Parties                                   :         The Nodal Officer,

                                                                      Vodafone Idea Ltd.

                                                                      4th Floor, Angels Arcade,

                                                                      South Kalamassery,

                                                                      Kochi – 682022.

                                                                      (Adv. D. Zaibo)

O  R  D  E  R

         

Sri. Manulal V.S. President

          Complainant absent.  No representation.  Opposite party represented.  Complainant is continuously absent.  Inspite of receipt of notice from this Commission, complainant did not care to appear before the Commission or to file objection to IA 207/2021.  Complainant is out from the proceedings of the case from 12-10-2021 onwards.  After that, there is no representation from the side of the complainant.  Hence it is seen from the conduct of the complainant that he is not interested to proceed with complaint. Hence the complaint is dismissed for nonappearance of the complainant.

          Pronounced in the Open Commission on this the 21st day of June, 2022

Sri. Manulal V.S. President               Sd/-

Sri. K.M. Anto, Member                   Sd/-

                                                                                          By Order

                                                                                          Assistant Registrar

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.