Kerala

Kottayam

CC/70/2023

A K Radhakrishnan - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vivo India Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

K A Bijoy

20 Sep 2023

ORDER

Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kottayam
Kottayam
 
Complaint Case No. CC/70/2023
( Date of Filing : 06 Mar 2023 )
 
1. A K Radhakrishnan
Areekara House, Karikode P O kottayam
Kottayam
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Vivo India Ltd
Kerala head office , Providence road, Kacheripady Kochi. Represented by its Manager.
2. Amigos Communications
Opposite Pvt. Bus stand, Kuravilangadu P O Kottayam. Represented by its proprietor
3. Haijin trade India Pvt Ltd.
Ground floor, Jubilee Building T B road, Kottayam. Represented by its proprietor.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R MEMBER
 HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 20 Sep 2023
Final Order / Judgement

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KOTTAYAM

Dated this the 20th day of September, 2023

 

Present:   Sri.Manulal.V.S, President

            Smt.Bindhu.R, Member

                                                                                                Sri.K.M.Anto, Member

                                                                                  CC No.70/2023 (Filed on 06/03/2023)

 

Complainant                                                                                        :     A.K. Radhakrishnan S/o Kunjukunju,

                                                                                                                  Areekara House,

                                                  Karikode P.O,

                                                 Kottayam  -  686610.          

                       

                                                                                                          Vs

Opposite parties                                                                                 :    1.  Vivo India Limited,

                                                                                Kerala Head Office,  

                                                                                67, 2052, Providence Road, 

                                                                                Kacheripady, Cochin – 26,

                                                                               Represented  by its Manager. 

                                                                          2.  Amigos Communications,

                                                                                                                   Opposite Private Bus Stand,

                                                                                                                   Kuravilangadu P.O,

                                                                                                                   Kottayam – 686633,

                                                                                                                  Represented  by its Proprietor.

                                                                                                             3.   Haijin Trade India (P) Limited,

                                                                                                                  Building No.XIII/634,

                                                                                                                  Ground Floor,  Jubilee Building,

                                                                                                                  T.B Road, Kottayam – 686001,

                                                                                                                 Represented  by its Proprietor.                              

                                                O R D E R

Sri.Manulal V.S, President

This is a complaint filed  under  Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act 2019 and the matter stood  over to this date for  consideration.

 This is a complaint filed by the complainant against the opposite parties alleging deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. After admitting the complaint notice was issued to the opposite parties. Upon notice first and second opposite parties appeared before the Commission.  Though they appeared before the Commission they failed to file version within the statutory period. Notice to the third opposite party is returned unserved.  Since 30/05/2023 this case was posted for taking steps by the complainant against the third opposite party.  When the case came up for consideration today, it is noticed that the complainant  was continuously absent since 30/05/2023 and not taken any steps against the third opposite party,   inspite of giving sufficient opportunities for the same.  

In the above circumstances we find that the complainant is not interested to further proceed with this complaint.  In view of above discussion, we find that this is a fit case to be dismissed for default. 

In the result the complaint is dismissed.

       Pronounced in the open Commission on this the  20th  day of September, 2023

                 Sri.Manulal V.S, President     Sd/-

     Smt.Bindhu.R, Member         Sd/- 

     Sri. K.M. Anto, Member        Sd/-

                                                                       By Order,

                                                                             Sd/-

                                                             Assistant Registrar

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. V.S. Manulal]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Bindhu R]
MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.M.Anto]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.