Karnataka

StateCommission

A/289/2024

BHIMANNA GOUDA - Complainant(s)

Versus

VISHALA - Opp.Party(s)

RAJESH RAO K

02 Apr 2024

ORDER

KARNATAKA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
BASAVA BHAVAN, BANGALORE.
 
First Appeal No. A/274/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/11/2023 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT SANTHOSHI
W/O BHAGVANDAS SOMANI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE R/AT DEEPAM COLONY LAKSHMINAGAR BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/275/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/8/2023 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT MAINA
W/O SUNIL KUMAR SOMANI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE R/AT DEEPAM COLONY LAKSHMINAGAR BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/276/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/7/2023 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SRI BRIJESHKUMAR M DIVEDI
REP BY HIS P.A HOLDER SMT SANTHOSHI W/O BHAGAVANDAS SOMANI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE R/AT DEEPAM COLONY LAKSHMINAGAR BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/277/2024
( Date of Filing : 19 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 13/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/23/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT. HUSENBI
D/O SHARAMUDDIN SAGAR AGED ABOUT 37 YEARS OCC HOUSEHOLLD WORK R/AT OPPOSITE DENTAL COLLEGE BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/278/2024
( Date of Filing : 19 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/46/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT. SHAHNAZ
W/O SADIK MULLA AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS OCC COOLIE R/AT ILIYAS NAGAR NEAR RAILWAY STATION BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/279/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/41/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MARUTHI
S/O SANTARAM CHAVAN AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS OCC COOLIE R/AT NAVANAGARA BAGALKOT DISTRICT & TALUK BAGALOKT 587103
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/280/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 18/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/12/2023 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT SANGEETHA
W/O BRIGESH DIVEDI REP BY HER G P A HOLDER SMT SANTHOSHI W/O BHAGAWANDAS SOMANI AGED ABOUT 44 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE R/AT DEEPAM COLONY LAKSHMINAGAR BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/281/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/92/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. YASIN
S/O HUSENSAB BALIKAI AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/AT KERUR TALUK BADAMI DIST BAGALOKT 587206
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/282/2024
( Date of Filing : 19 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/30/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. NAGARAJ YELLAPPA TALAWAR
S/O YELLAPPA TALAWAR AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/AT NEAR DATTA TEMPLE SECTOR NO-29 PLOT NO- 50-A NAVANAGAR BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT-587103
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/283/2024
( Date of Filing : 19 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/47/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT. BISMILLA
W/O BABUSAB MUJAWAR AGED ABOUT 43 YEARS OCC COOLIE R/AT NEAR TAYYABA MASJID BUS STAND RAOD BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/284/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/45/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SADIK S MULLA
AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS OCC COOLIE R/AT ILIYAS NAGAR NEAR RAILWAY STATION BAGALKOT DISTRICT & TALUK BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/285/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/10/2023 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT ROOPA
W/O MADHUSUDAN SOMANI AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE R/AT DEEPAM COLONY LAKSHMINAGAR BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/286/2024
( Date of Filing : 19 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 17/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/29/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOWDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT, R/O TENGINAMATH, BAGALKOT.587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. MALLIKARJUN
S/O GYANAPPA MIRJI AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/AT BEVOOR BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587115
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/287/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/69/2022 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANN GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. RAHAMATULLA
S/O MAHAMMADAHANIF SANNAKI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS OCC BUSINESS R/AT NEAR TAYYABA MASJID BUS STAND RAOD BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/288/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 20/06/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/4/2023 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI
W/O GIRISH ANGADI AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS OCC HOUSE WIFE R/AT HATTI GALLI NEAR NAGESHWAR TEMPLE BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/289/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 24/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/6/2023 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. VISHALA
D/O GIRISH ANGADI AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS OCC STUDENT REP BY HER NEXT FRIEND MOTHER SMT VIJAYALAKSHMI W/O GIRISH ANGADI R/AT HATTI GALLI NEAR NAGARESHWAR TEMPLE BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
First Appeal No. A/290/2024
( Date of Filing : 21 Jan 2024 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 21/07/2023 in Case No. Execution Application No. EA/5/2023 of District Bagalkot)
 
1. BHIMANNA GOUDA
AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS MANAGER CBT MULTIPURPOSE SOUHARDA CO-OP BAGALKOT R/O TENGINAMATH BAGALKOT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. SRI VISHWAS
S/O GIRISH ANGADI AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS OCC STUDENT R/AT HATTI GALLI NEAR NAGARESHWAR TEMPLE BAGALKOT TALUK & DISTRICT BAGALOKT 587101
BAGALKOT
KARNATAKA
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Huluvadi G. Ramesh PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Krishnamurthy B.Sangannavar JUDICIAL MEMBER
 HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Divyashree.M MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 02 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

02.04.2024:-

COMMON ORDER IN A.NOs.274 to 290 OF 2024

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HULUVADI G. RAMESH, PRESIDENT

01.   The above Appeals are set for hearing on admission. The Commission heard Learned Counsel for Appellant in all the above Appeals.  Learned counsel for Appellant files Memo with certified copy of the Common Order dated: 22.12.2023 passed in Appeal Nos.2031 to 2038/2023 and submits that, this Hon’ble Commission had already allowed the said Appeals by remanding back the consumer complaints to the below Commission to decide as observed in A/1871/2023, dated: 19.10.2023.  Further LC submits that, these are all similar Appeals filed by the Appellant herein, so prayed to allow the same to avoid confliction of judgment.  Hence heard the LC for Appellant and perused the Impugned order, grounds of Appeal and the Appeal papers on record in all the above Appeals.   It reveals that, all these 17 Appeals are filed arising out of same cause of action and the Appellant herein is same and the Respondents are different and hence to avoid repetition of facts we proceed to pass this common order. 

 

02.    The parties to these Appeals will be referred to as their rank assigned to them by the Commission below.

03.   The JDR - Bhimannagouda has filed these 17 Appeals Under Section 73 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019 challenging the impugned orders passed by the District Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bagalkot, seeking relief to set aside the impugned order passed in the above Appeals and to grant stay to the execution proceedings by remanding back the consumer complaint for re-trial.  The details of the above 17 Appeals are as under:-

Sl.

No.

Appeal No.

Consumer Complaint No.

Date of Disposal of Consumer Complaint

01.

274/2024

18/2022

20.08.2022

02.

275/2024

19/2022

22.08.2022

03.

276/2024

36/2022

23.08.2022

04.

277/2024

144/2018

31.03.2021

05.

278/2024

128/2018

15.11.2021

06.

279/2024

147/2018(common order passed in CC Nos.143, 145 & 147/2018)

30.07.2021

07.

280/2024

37/2022

24.08.2022

08.

281/2024

143/2018(common order passed in CC Nos.143, 145 & 147/2018)

30.07.2021

09.

282/2024

156/2018

15.11.2021

10.

283/2024

75/2019

09.06.2022

11.

284/2024

145/2018(common order passed in CC Nos.143, 145 & 147/2018)

30.07.2021

12.

285/2024

17/2022

19.08.2022

13.

286/2024

128/2018

15.11.2021

14.

287/2024

143/2019

30.07.2022

15.

288/2024

16/2022

18.08.2022

16.

289/2024

15/2022

17.08.2022

17.

290/2024

14/2022

16.08.2022

 

04.   Further on perusal of Appeal order submitted by the LC for JDR in Appeal Nos.2031 to 2038/2023 it reveals that, by referring to the earlier order passed by this Commission in Appeal No.1871/2023 dated: 19.10.2023 by concluding that, to avoid confliction of decisions this Commission had allowed the Appeal Nos.2031 to 2038/2023 by remanding back the consumer complaints to the District Commission consequently set aside the impugned orders passed in the respective consumer complaints.  As the same cause of action arose in the instant 17 Appeals also and the grounds were urged by the Appellant herein and hence proceed to pass the final order.

 

05.   At Para-1 of the Appeal order passed in Appeal Nos.2031 to 2038/2023 this Commission had referred Para-4 to 6 of Appeal order No.1871/2023 which reads as under:-

  1. It is undisputed that, the Complainants have deposited the amount under FD, RD, Pension plan and Share certificate with OP society in the year 2014 and 2015.  However, OPs accusing one on the other, failed to release the amount.  It is found from the enquiry, that Police have registered the FIR in CR/90/2016 punishable under sections 408, 420, 417 R/w section 34 of IPC and Police have conducted investigation and had seized the books of accounts and records of the OP-Society and filed charge-sheet in CC/36/2017 and police have not filed charge-sheet against other OPs. Hence, by submitting that, there was no charge sheet against other OPs, cannot escape from the liability. From this, it is evident that the CBT Multipurpose Souharda Co-operative Society, Bagalkot is shown to be in-existence and the present office bearers whether or not or still continued or not or anybody comes over in their place is immaterial, since OP-Society is shown to be in-existence and is bound to settle the disputes of the poor depositors in accordance with law.

 

  1. Further, we noticed that, none of the particulars were furnished as to conducting of general body meeting, audit etc.,.  From this, it seems to be, no such activities have been conducted in the OP-Society by the Board of Directors/office bearers. If such activities would have been conducted periodically, it could have avoided the misappropriation of funds, so also, injustice to the depositors. As such, all office bearers, whether they are retired or in service in the OP-Society are to be held as Defaulter for such misappropriation.

 

  1. No doubt it is true that being accepting the amount from the depositors as FD, RD etc., OP-Society alone is responsible for returning the amount after its maturity. In other words, Society’s President/Ex-President, other office bearers, Secretary/Ex-Secretary, Treasurer/Ex-Treasurer, Directors/Ex-Directors, Manager/Ex-Manager or with any other designated persons as the case may be who were indulged in fraudulent activity with a view to defraud the Complainants are liable to return the FDRs along with interest.

06.   Since Appeal No.1871/2023 and Appeal Nos.2031 to 2038/2023 was disposed-off with a direction to the below Commission to re-admit the consumer complaints and to issue notice to all the parties, to examine whether President/Ex-President or other office bearers, Secretary/Ex-Secretary, Treasurer/ Ex-Treasurer, Directors/Ex-Directors, Manager/Ex-Manager as the case may be indulged in misfeasance/fraudulent activity with a view to defraud the complainants under the cloak of CBT Multipurpose Souharda Co-operative Society, Bagalkot, and to decide who are all liable to repay the maturity value of the amount deposited by the Complainants in various forms such as FD, RD, Pension plan and Share certificates. Further the Commission below is directed to allow all parties to the consumer complaints to place evidence and additional evidence if any on record and decide the consumer complaints as observed as early as possible keeping in mind the object of Consumer Laws, Date of Receipt of the consumer complaints and the Date of Deposits. It is therefore, the Learned Counsel for Appellant submits that, these 17 Appeals are also filed to set aside the impugned orders passed in CC No.18/2022, dated: 20.08.2022, CC No.19/2022, dated: 22.08.2022, CC No.36/2022, dated: 23.08.2022, CC No.144/2018, dated: 31.03.2021, CC No.128/2018, dated: 15.11.2021, CC No.147/2018, dated: 30.07.2021, CC No.37/2022, dated: 24.08.2022, CC No.143/2018, dated: 30.07.2021, CC No.156/2018, dated: 15.11.2021, CC No.75/2019, dated: 09.06.2022, CC No.145/2018, dated: 30.07.2021, CC No.17/2022, dated: 19.08.2022, CC No.128/2018, dated: 15.11.2021, CC No.143/2019, dated: 30.07.2022, CC No.16/2022, dated: 18.08.2022, CC No.15/2022, dated: 17.08.2022, and CC No.14/2022, dated: 16.08.2022 respectively on the same line, is hereby recorded and the Commission found not necessary to make mention of all facts of these 17 Appeals, since Bhimannagouda, Aged about 32 years, Manager, CBT Multipurpose Souharda Co-operative Society is a common party as an Appellant, not only in these 17 Appeals but in Appeal No.1871/2023 and Appeal Nos.2031 to 2038/2023 decided by the Commission on 19.10.2023 and 22.12.2023 respectively. In the above such circumstances, to avoid conflict of decisions, followed by the aforesaid orders, proceed to dispense with issuance of notice of Appeal and IA notice to be served on Respondents to avoid further delay for the reasons recorded in the said order and proceed to remand back CC No.18/2022, dated: 20.08.2022, CC No.19/2022, dated: 22.08.2022, CC No.36/2022, dated: 23.08.2022, CC No.144/2018, dated: 31.03.2021, CC No.128/2018, dated: 15.11.2021, CC No.147/2018, dated: 30.07.2021, CC No.37/2022, dated: 24.08.2022, CC No.143/2018, dated: 30.07.2021, CC No.156/2018, dated: 15.11.2021, CC No.75/2019, dated: 09.06.2022, CC No.145/2018, dated: 30.07.2021, CC No.17/2022, dated: 19.08.2022, CC No.128/2018, dated: 15.11.2021, CC No.143/2019, dated: 30.07.2022, CC No.16/2022, dated: 18.08.2022, CC No.15/2022, dated: 17.08.2022, and CC No.14/2022, dated: 16.08.2022 respectively to the below Commission to decide as observed in Appeal No.1871/2023 and Appeal Nos.2031 to 2038/2023 already decided on 19.10.2023 and on 22.12.2023 respectively.  No order as to costs.

 

07.    The original of this Appeal order shall be kept in A.No.274/2024 and a certified copy thereof shall be kept in Appeal Nos. 275 to 290/2024.

 

08.    Provide copy of this order to the concerned District Commission as well as to the parties to the Appeals.

 

                    Sd/-                                                  Sd/-

       JUDICIAL MEMBER                         PRESIDENT

KNMP*

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE Huluvadi G. Ramesh]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. Krishnamurthy B.Sangannavar]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Smt. Divyashree.M]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.