BEFORE THE ADDITIONAL BENCH OF A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION ATHYDERABAD.

FA.No.716/2007 AGAINST C.C.No.57/2006 KRISHNA

Between:

1. The Director of Distance Education,

2. The Director,

   PamkajPlaza, Plot No.9,

1. Vinnakota Rama Mohana Rao,

2. Shri Bharadwaj,

   MSRAcademy

   HanumanTemple,

   HinduCollege,

Counsel for the Appellants: M/s. S.Sriram

Counsel for the Respondents. (Mr.P.Suresh Kumar-R1)

QUORUM:                   &

SRI K.SATYANAND, MEMBER

.

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTIETH DAY OF JANUARY,

TWO THOUSAND TEN

(Typed to the dictation of Sri K.Satyanand,Hon’ble Member)
***

             ResearchFoundationDeemedUniversity,Salem.

                     So there is absolutely no difficulty in coming to a conclusion that this is  

         Thus they could have filed vast record showing the hiring of the services of the examination centres rather a contract between the respective examination centres and the university and the other opposite parties as also the memorandum of marks showing the attendance or otherwise of the complainant, as, if really the complainant alone absented himself he would have been marked absent in the memorandum of marks.         

                                                                       JM