Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

FA/198/2014

SUN DIRECT TV PVT.L TD., - Complainant(s)

Versus

VINCENT R. RAJ - Opp.Party(s)

M.SNEHA

10 Nov 2021

ORDER

IN THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

 CHENNAI – 600 003.

                         BEFORE         Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                                                 Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.198/2014

(Against the order in C.C. No.308/2009, dated:28.05.2012 on the file of

D.C.D.R.F., Coimbatore)

                                                                  DATED THE 10TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2021

 

M/s. Sun Direct TV (P) Ltd.,

Sun Network Building, Vincent Road,

Kottaimedu, Coimbatore – 641 001

                                                                                                       .. Appellant / Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

1. Vincent R. Raj

    5/63, Agnes Raj Home,

    Viswasapuram, Saravanampatty Post,

    Coimbatore – 641 035.

 

2. M/s Pavithra Electronics,

    138, Sathy Main Road,

    Saravanampatty Post,

    Coimbatore – 641 035.                                                    .. Respondent / Complainant.

 

Counsel for the Appellant / Opposite party                     : M/s M. Sneha

For the Respondent 1 / Complainant 1                           : Party In Person

For the Respondent  2 / Complainant 2                          : P.P Effected, called absent

 

          This appeal coming up before us on 10.11.2021 for hearing. Due to non – representation of the Appellant, this Commission made the following order:                                                                                                

 

Docket order

 

            No representation for Appellant. R1 in person present. Today this matter is posted for appearance of Appellant and for filing written arguments of Appellant and for arguments. When this matter was called at 11.00 a.m, there was no representation for Appellant, since the matter was passed over and again called at 1.00 noon, the appellant was again not present. Hence, the Appeal is dismissed for default.  No cost.

 

 

                    Sd/-                                                                                                  Sd/-                                                                        

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                           R.SUBBIAH                        

          MEMBER                                                                                              PRESIDENT

  

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.