Nitin Sayal filed a consumer case on 04 May 2023 against Vikson Securities Pvt Ltd in the Fatehgarh Sahib Consumer Court. The case no is CC/109/2021 and the judgment uploaded on 30 May 2023.
Complaint under Section 34 to 35 of Consumer Protection Act 2019)
Quorum
Sh. S.K.Aggarwal, President
Ms. Shivani Bhargava, Member
Sh. Manjit Singh Bhinder, Member
Present: Complainant in Person .
Sh.M.K.Dhar Representative of OPs no.1 and 2.
The complaint has been filed against the OPs (opposite parties) under Section 34 to 35 of Consumer Protection Act-2019 alleging deficiency in service with the prayer to give directions to the OPs to refund the amount Rs.66461.06/- along with interest @ 18% P.A, to pay compensation of Rs.50,000/- as compensation for harassment to the complainant .
The complainant opened a DMAT and trading account with OP no.1 through its branch at Mandigobindgarh i.e OP2 When the account was settled in Feb. 2019 an amount of Rs.66,461.6/- was out standing against OPs . The complainant telephonically requested to OPs to release the amount and OPs assured the complainant. The complainant then sent text messages to OP no.1 to transfer the amount to his Bank account , but to no avail. The complainant also visited office of OP no.1 who got some papers signed by the complainant and assured to credit the amount to complainant’s account . However the OPs always put off the matter on one pretext or other and failed to release the said amount. Hence this complaint.
Notice of the complaint was given to the OPs through registered Post OPs appeared through their Counsel and filed joint written version.
The complaint has been contested by the OPs, filed joint reply written version and raised preliminary objections. The OPs have not settled the accounts of the complainant and complainant has not placed on record copies of reconciling of the record. The complainant has further suppressed that Mohali Police has registered one FIR against the OPs and court has blocked the bank accounts . Police has seized server of OPs and analyses of record and OPs are unable to comment upon the contended dues of complainant. The OPs prayer for dismissal of complaint with cost has been made.
In support of his complaint , complainant tendered his affidavit Ex.CW1/A along with copies of documents i.e Ex.CW1 contract note cum bill tax invoice dated 30.1.2019, Ex.CW2 statement of accounts, Ex.CW3 notice by the complainant to OPs, Ex.CW4 text message.
In rebuttal the OPs has tendered in evidence EX.OPW1/A affidavit of Mahraj Krishen Dhar , accountant of Vikson Securities Pvt. Ltd, Ex.OP1/1 First Information Report , Ex.OP1/2 order of Ruchi Kamboj JMIC, SAS Nagar dated 18.5.2019 , Ex.OP1/3 seizer Memo of Police and closed their evidence.
Heard. Entire record has been perused.
The complainant has proved his dealings with the OPs vide a contract note cum bill tax invoice dated 30 /1/2019 vide Ex.CW1, The complainant has also proved his closing balance of Rs.66,461.06/- as per statement of accounts dated 6.4.2019 vide Ex.CW2. Further complainant vide Ex.CW3 issued notice to the OPs for releasing the amount of Rs. 66,461/-. Vide Ex.CW4 the complainant has proved text messages sent by him to the OPs. The OPs have tendered copy of FIR no.0047 dated 9.5.2019 registered against them vide Ex.OP1/1 and vide Ex.OP1/2 has tendered copy of ordered dated 18.5.2019 issued by JMIC, SAS Nagar. Vide order dated 18.5.2019 the Ld. Court has granted permission to Police to seizue servers and to seize other related record s at the office premises of OPs .The OPs have also tendered vide Ex.OP1/3 , the seizure memo of Police.
From the perusal of the above facts and evidence , it is made out that the issue is between the complainant and the OPs regarding the refund of Rs. 66,461.06/-by the OPs . The complainant has proved through evidence placed on record , his dealing with the OPs as well as amount of Rs.66,461.06/- to his credit The OPs have taken the plea that an FIR was registered against them at SAS Nagar and as per orders of Ld. SAS Court , their server and other records were seized by Police , due to which they were unable to process refund of the complainant .
Keeping in view of above said discussion, we are of opinion that if the OPs have committed some wrong doing leading to registration of FIR against them and seizer of their server and other records , this can not be a fair and just ground to deny rightful refund of the complainant .
As a corollary of our above discussion, the present complaint is partly allowed. OPs are held liable for deficiency in service severally and jointly. The OPs are directed as under :-
[a] To pay Rs.66,461.06/- to the complainant along with interest @ 9% P.A from the date of filing of complaint within 30 days failing which interest @ 12% P.A. shall be payable.
[b] To pay a sum of Rs. 10,000/- as compensation for harassment and mental agony to the complainant.
Compliance of the order be made by the OPs within 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Failing which the complainant shall be entitled to recover the above said amount through legal process. The complaint could not be decided within the statutory period due to due to pandemic of Covid-19 and paucity of staff. Copy of this order be sent to the complainant and the OPs as per rules. File be consigned to record room
Pronounced 4 May 2023
(S. K. Aggarwal)
President
(Shivani Bhargava)
Member
( Manjit Singh Bhinder )
Member
Consumer Court Lawyer
Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.