Haryana

StateCommission

RP/47/2018

AMAZON SELLER SERVICES PVT.LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

VIKRAM SINGH - Opp.Party(s)

INDERJIT SINGH

04 Apr 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

 

                                                 

Revision Petition No.    47 of 2018

Date of Institution:       28.03.2018

Date of Decision:         04.04.2018

 

Amazon Seller Services Private Limited, registered office at Brigade Gateway, 08^th Floor, 26/1, Dr. Raj Kumar Road, Malleshwaram (W), Bangalore-560055, India, through its authorized signatory Shri Rahul Sundaram.

 

…….Petitioner-Opposite Party No.1

 

Versus

 

1.      Vikram Singh son of Shri Hori Lal, resident of House No.171, Street No.8, Sector-2, Sainik Enclave, Mohan Garden, Uttam Nagar, New Delhi-10059.

 

……Respondent No.1-Complainant

 

2.      Amazon Development Centre, Corporate Office-Sikanderpur, Sector-26, Gurugram, Haryana, through its Manager.

 

……Respondent No.2-Opposite Party No.2

 

 

 

CORAM:   Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                   Shri Balbir Singh, Judicial Member.

 

 

Present:     Shri Inderjit Singh, counsel for the petitioner

 

 

 

O R D E R

 

 

NAWAB SINGH, J. (ORAL)

 

Amazon Seller Services Private Limited-opposite party No.1 (petitioner herein) is in revision against the order dated January 12^th, 2017 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Gurgaon (for short ‘District Forum’), whereby petitioner was proceeded ex parte.   

2.      Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that summons were inadvertently put in some other official file due to which nobody could appear on behalf of petitioner and was proceeded ex parte. The next date of hearing before the District Forum is April 05^th, 2017.

3.      Be that as it may and without delving deeper, this Commission is of the opinion that ends of justice would be met if the impugned order is set aside and opportunity is granted to the petitioner to file written version and contest the complaint. For whatever inconvenience has been caused to the other side suitable costs shall be the remedy.

4.      Accordingly, this revision petition is accepted and the impugned order is set aside subject to the conditional cost of Rs.3000/- which is to be paid by the petitioner to the respondent No.1-complainant, on the date fixed, before the District Forum. Consequently, the petitioner is accorded opportunity to file written version and join the proceedings.

5.      This revision petition is disposed of without issuing notice to the respondents with a view to impart substantive justice to the parties and to save the huge expenses, which may be incurred by the respondents as also in order to avoid unnecessary delay in adjudication of the matter.  Reliance can be placed on a Division Bench Judgment of Hon’ble Punjab and Haryana High Court rendered in Batala Machine Tools Workshop Cooperative Vs. Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Gurdaspur (CWP No.9563 of 2002) decided on June 27^th, 2002.

6.      The petitioner is directed to appear before the District Forum, on April 05^th, 2018, the date already fixed.

7.      Copy of this order be sent to the District Forum.     

                           

Announced 04.04.2018

(Balbir Singh) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

D.R.