VIKAS NIJHAVAN V/S PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD. - Consumer Court Case

NCDRC

FA/1011/2016

PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

VIKAS NIJHAVAN - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. KHAITAN & KHAITAN

07 Mar 2022

ORDER


NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1008 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 08/07/2016 in Complaint No. 79/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. PARVEEN MANGLA
SON OF SH. SUBHASH MANGLA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 1757, NIRWANA SOCIETY, SECTOR-49-B,
CHANDIGARH

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1010 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 08/07/2016 in Complaint No. 82/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. DEEPAK SALUJA & ANR.
S/O. SH. O.P. SALUJA, R/O. HOUSE NO. 3240/2, SECTOR-40-D,
CHANDIGARH
2. ANUREET SALUJA
W/O. SH. DEEPAK SALUJA, R/O. HOUSE NO. 3240/2, SECTOR-40-D,
CHANDIGARH

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1011 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 08/07/2016 in Complaint No. 101/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. VIKAS NIJHAVAN
SON OF SH. SUBHASH NIJHAVAN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 18, SHANTI NAGAR, MODEL TOWN,
PANIPAT
HARYANA

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1049 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 15/07/2016 in Complaint No. 81/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. RITESH TRIKHA & ANR.
2. NIDHI T.
-

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1357 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 02/05/2017 in Complaint No. 776/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI,
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. AJAY NASHIKKAR
SON FO LATE SH. B.R. NASHIKKAR, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 117, SHUBHAM COMPLEX, NAU-GAJA ROAD, SHINDE KI CHAWANI, LASHKAR,
GWALIOR,

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1358 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 02/05/2017 in Complaint No. 969/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS RESISTEERED,OFFICE AT NO.-5,DHANARAJ CHAMBERS,1ST FLOOR,SATBARI,
NEW DELHI-110074
DLHI

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. KHARAITI LAL MALHOTRA & ANR.
S/O LATE SHRI CHAMAN LAL MALHOTRA, RESIDENTS OF HOUSE NO.324-A,SECTOR 51-A
CHANDIGARH
CHANDIGARH
2. PAWAN MALHOTRA
S/O KHARAITILAL MALHOTRA,HOUSE NO.-324-A,SECTOR-51A,
CHANDIGARH

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1359 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 05/05/2017 in Complaint No. 82/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ATS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.-5.DHANARAJ CHAMBERS,1ST FLOOR,
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. SUKHPAL SINGH BHULLAR
SON OF SH.DARSHAN SINGH,RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.2094,SECTOR-15,
CHANDIGARH

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1459 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 23/08/2016 in Complaint No. 222/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI,
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. RAMAL JAIN & ANR.
WIFE OF SH. PADMA KUMAR JAIN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 95, NEW LAL BAGH COLONY, PATIALA,
PUNJAB
2. VEENA JAIN
WIFE OF SH. RAMESH KUMAR JAIN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 95, NEW LAL BAGH COLONY,
PATIALA
PUNJAB

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1460 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 23/08/2016 in Complaint No. 206/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI,
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. SAHIL JAIN & ANR.
SON OF SH. SANJIV JAIN, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 267, ADARSH NAGAR, JALANDHAR,
2. SANJIV JAIN SON OF SHRI NIRMAL KUMAR JAIN
RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 267, ADARSH NAGAR,
JALANDHAR
PUNJAB

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1461 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 20/09/2016 in Complaint No. 150/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
OFFICE AT NO.5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI, NEW DELHI-110074
2. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
SH. AJAY KUMAR KURICHH [AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE.] CORPORATE OFFCIE AT SCO NO.6-8, FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS, SECTOR-9D, CHANDIGARH-160009

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. RAJINDER SINGH & ANR.
H. No. 759, FF, sector 43A,
CHANDIGARH
2. BHAJAN KAUR
THROUGH HER GENERAL POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER, SHRI RAJINDER SINGH, S/O LATE SHIR AJIT SINGH, R/O HOUSE NO.1179, SECTOR-43-B,
CHANDIGARH
3. BHAJAN KAUR
W/O SH. RAJINDER SINGH H. No. 759, FF, SECTOR 43A, CHANDIGARH
4. BHAJAN KAUR
W/O SH. RAJINDER SINGH H. No. 759, FF, SECTOR 43A, CHANDIGARH
5. BHAJAN KAUR
W/O SH. RAJINDER SINGH H. No. 759, FF, SECTOR 43A, CHANDIGARH

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1561 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 30/09/2016 in Complaint No. 281/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. DEEPAK KUMAR
SON OF SH. PURAN CHAND, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 56, KHALAPUR HANUMAN ROAD, GALI KHATIYON SHAMLI,
UTTAR PRADESH-247776

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1621 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 19/06/2017 in Complaint No. 106/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, SH. AJAY KUMAR KURICHH. OFFICE NO.5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI.
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. ABHISHEK TRIPATHI
S/O. LATE SH. VINOD KUMAR TRIPATHI. H. NO.102, SECTOR19-A.
CHANDIGARH.

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1658 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 04/07/2017 in Complaint No. 160/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

WITH
IA/12083/2017(Stay),IA/12084/2017(Placing addl. documents)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SH. AJAY KUMAR KURICHH. REGISTERED OFFICE-5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI.
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. DHARAM RAJ MODGIL & ANR.
S/O. LATE SH. RAMCHAND MODGIL. HOUSE NO.1220, SECTOR-7B.
CHANDIGARH.
2. MRS. RAM RATI MODGIL.
W/O. SH. DHARAM RAJ MODGIL. HOUSE NO.1220, SECTOR-7-B.
CHANDIGARH.

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1692 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 01/11/2016 in Complaint No. 317/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

WITH
IA/286/2017(Placing Record),IA/12562/2016(Placing addl. documents),IA/18046/2017(Placing addl. documents)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI,
NEW DELHI-110041

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. AMIT GOEL
SON OF SH. DHAN RAJ, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 2786, OLD GRAIN MARKET, NISSING,
DISTRICT-KARNAL,
HARYANA

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1724 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 27/10/2016 in Complaint No. 250/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
REP. BY SH. AJAY KUMAR KURICHH, HAVING ITS RGD. OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. MONICA CHHIBER SHARMA & ANR.
WIFE OF LATE SH. RAKESH SHARMA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 2098, JALVAYU VIHAR, SECTOR-67, SAS NAGAR,
MOHALI, PUNJAB
2. HDFC BANK
SCO 153-154-155, SECTOR-8-C, MADHYA MARG,
CHANDIGARH

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1777 OF 2016

(Against the Order dated 18/11/2016 in Complaint No. 419/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

WITH
IA/6907/2018(Modification of order),IA/8359/2017(Release of amount)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI,
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. RAMESH KUMAR & ANR.

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 1811 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 31/07/2017 in Complaint No. 194/2017 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE, SH.RAJIV BHATIA. CORPORATE OFFICE: SCO NO.6-8, FIRST AND SECOND FLOORS, SECTOR-9 D.
CHANDIGARH-160009

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. RUPINDER SINGH
S/O. SH. SADAR SADHU SINGH. R/O. H.NO. 240, URBAN ESTATE, PHASE-1.
PATIALA
PUNJAB

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 433 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 02/02/2017 in Complaint No. 602/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI ,
NEW DELHI-1100074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. JOGENDRA PAL SINGH & ANR.
S/O. OF SH. DHARAM SINGH, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 697, SECTOR-80,
MOHALI
PUNJAB-140308
2. GANGADEEP SINGH ARORA
SON OF JOGENDRA PAL SINGH, RESIDENT AT 24, BABINGTON COURT, GOWER STREET, DERBY,
U.K. DE11RH

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 784 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 09/03/2017 in Complaint No. 702/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SH. AJAY KUMAR KURICHH, HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI
NEW DELHI-110074

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. RAJINDER CHAUDHARY & 2 ORS.
SON OF SH. JAGAN NATH CHAUDHARY, ALL RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO. 53-A, DASHNESH COLONY, RAJPURA,
DISTRICT-PATIALA
PUNJAB-140401
2. YOGESH CHAUDHARY
SON OF SH. RAJINDER CHAUDHARY, R/O. HOUSE NO. 53-A, DASHMESH COLONY, RAJPURA, DISTRICT-PATIALA,
PUNJAB-140401
3. RAHUL CHAUDHARY
SON OF SH. RAJINDER CHAUDHARY, R/O. HOUSE NO. 53-A, DASHMESH COLONY, RAJPURA, DISTRICT-PATIALA,
PUNJAB-140401

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 812 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 10/03/2017 in Complaint No. 597/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD. & ANR.
HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT NO. 5, DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI,
NEW DELHI-110074
2. AMAN MALHOTRA
AUTHORISED SIGNATORY, PUMA REALTORS PRIVATE LIMITED, SCO NO. 6-8, 1ST AND 2ND FLOOR, SECTOR-9-D,
CHANDIGARH-160009

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. HARMOHINDER SINGH
SON OF SH. BALVINDER SINGH, RESIDENT OF 65A/L, MODEL TOWN, YAMUNA NAGAR,
HARYANA
PIN-135001

...........Respondent(s)


FIRST APPEAL NO. 909 OF 2017

(Against the Order dated 22/03/2017 in Complaint No. 759/2016 of the State Commission Chandigarh)

1. PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD.
HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.5,DHANRAJ CHAMBERS, 1ST FLOOR, SATBARI, NEW DELHI-110074
PUNJAB

...........Appellant(s)

Versus

1. JYOTI CHANANA
WIFE OF SH. AMIT CHANA, RESIDENT OF HOUSE NO.624,SECTOR7,GURGAON,HARYANA
HARYANA

...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE:
	HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE R.K. AGRAWAL,PRESIDENT

For the Appellant :

Mr. Aruj Dhingra, Advocate

For the Respondent :

Mr. Bharat Sood, Advocate
Mr. Samarth Agarwal, Advocate
Mr. Jitendra Kumar , Adovcate
Mr. C.P. Mohanty, Advocate
Mr. M.K. Ghosh, Advocate

Dated : 07 Mar 2022

ORDER

Mr. Aruj Dhingra, learned Counsel appearing for the Appellant on instructions received seeks permission to withdraw these Appeals and to file the Affidavits in this regard. He is permitted to file the Affidavit. The Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn.

The Registry is directed to refund the statutory amount deposited by the Appellant at the time of filing of these Appeals along with accrued interest if any within two weeks from today.


......................J
R.K. AGRAWAL
PRESIDENT

NCDRC

NCDRC

FA/1011/2016

PUMA REALTORS PVT. LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

VIKAS NIJHAVAN - Opp.Party(s)

M/S. KHAITAN & KHAITAN

07 Mar 2022

ORDER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Highly recommended!

5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Highly recommended!

Experties

Phone Number

7982270319