Kerala

StateCommission

A/234/2023

BIOTECH RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD - Complainant(s)

Versus

VIJAYAKUMAR P - Opp.Party(s)

21 Aug 2023

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
 
First Appeal No. A/234/2023
( Date of Filing : 04 Apr 2023 )
(Arisen out of Order Dated 25/10/2022 in Case No. Complaint Case No. CC/27/2020 of District Malappuram)
 
1. BIOTECH RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD
NORTH PIPELINE ROAD THONDAYAD CHEVARAMBALAM P O KOZHIKODE
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BIOTECH RENEWABLE ENERGY PVT LTD
M P APPAN ROAD VAZHUTHACAUD THYCAUD P O THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695014
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. VIJAYAKUMAR P
CHITRAS MARATTAPADI P O PANDIKKAD ERNAD TALUK MALAPPURAM 673017
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D JUDICIAL MEMBER
  SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A MEMBER
  SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
Dated : 21 Aug 2023
Final Order / Judgement

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

I.A. No. 495/2023 in APPEAL No. 234/2023

ORDER DATED: 21.08.2023

(Against the Order in C.C. 27/2020 of CDRC, Malappuram)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN     : PRESIDENT

SRI. AJITH KUMAR D.                                                    : JUDICIAL MEMBER

SMT. BEENA KUMARY. A                                              : MEMBER

SRI. RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.                                        : MEMBER

PETITIONERS/APPELLANTS:

 

  1. The Manager, Biotech Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd., North Pipeline Road, Thondayad, Chevarambalam P.O., Kozhikode-673 017.

 

  1. The Managing Director, Biotech Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd., M.P. Appan Road, Vazhuthacaud, Thycaud P.O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 014.

(By Adv. Rajeev Kumar V.)

 

                                                Vs.

RESPONDENT:

 

Vijayakumar P., Chitras, Marattapadi P.O., Pandikkad, Ernad Taluk, Malappuram-673 017.

 

ORDER

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

No representation for the appellants.  The respondent is present in person.  This is a petition seeking condonation of a delay of 115 days in filing the appeal.  This petition is opposed by the respondent who appears in person.  According to the respondent, he had filed the complaint in the year 2020 that he has no other alternative since there was gross negligence on the part of the appellants at every stage of the proceedings.  After passing of the order also, there has been no response from their side.  He submits that there is no bonafides in the reason stated for condonation of delay. The respondent seeks dismissal of the delay condonation petition.

          We find that this petition had come up before us on 24.04.2023 and on a number of occasions there was no representation for the petitioners/appellants. The delay in this case is 115 days which is substantial.  The reason stated is that the previous counsel of the appellant was engaged and could not appear when the case was called by the District Commission.  We do not find any serious interest on the part of the petitioner in pursuing the petition.  The respondent is present in person and requests that the matter be heard and disposed of.  There is no representation for the petitioners today also as already noted above.  The affidavit does not disclose any satisfactory explanation for condoning the delay.  For the above reasons, this petition is dismissed.

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN  : PRESIDENT

 

                                AJITH KUMAR  D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

                                                                                                   BEENA KUMARY. A         : MEMBER

 

jb                                                                                                  RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.  : MEMBER  

 

KERALA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,

VAZHUTHACAUD, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM

APPEAL No. 234/2023

JUDGMENT DATED: 21.08.2023

(Against the Order in C.C. 27/2020 of CDRC, Malappuram)

PRESENT:

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN     : PRESIDENT

SRI. AJITH KUMAR D.                                                    : JUDICIAL MEMBER

SMT. BEENA KUMARY. A                                              : MEMBER

SRI. RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.                                        : MEMBER

APPELLANTS:

 

  1. The Manager, Biotech Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd., North Pipeline Road, Thondayad, Chevarambalam P.O., Kozhikode-673 017.

 

  1. The Managing Director, Biotech Renewable Energy Pvt. Ltd., M.P. Appan Road, Vazhuthacaud, Thycaud P.O., Thiruvananthapuram-695 014.

(By Adv. Rajeev Kumar V.)

 

                                                Vs.

RESPONDENT:

 

Vijayakumar P., Chitras, Marattapadi P.O., Pandikkad, Ernad Taluk, Malappuram-673 017.

 

JUDGMENT

HON’BLE JUSTICE SRI. K. SURENDRA MOHAN : PRESIDENT

 

Petition for condonation of delay dismissed.  Therefore this appeal is dismissed.                                 

The amount of statutory deposit made by the appellants shall be refunded to them, on proper acknowledgment. 

 

JUSTICE K. SURENDRA MOHAN  : PRESIDENT

 

                              AJITH KUMAR  D. : JUDICIAL MEMBER

 

                                                                                               BEENA KUMARY. A         : MEMBER

 

                                                                                             RADHAKRISHNAN K.R.  : MEMBER

 

jb        

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI.K.SURENDRA MOHAN]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SRI.AJITH KUMAR.D]
JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
 
[ SMT.BEENAKUMARI.A]
MEMBER
 
 
[ SRI.RADHAKRISHNAN.K.R]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.