Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/94/2013

G. Daniel Thomas - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vijaya Medical and Educational Trust, Rep. by its Managing Trustee & 7 Ors. - Opp.Party(s)

S. Bharath & Asso.,

27 Jul 2022

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI

                                     BEFORE    Hon’ble THIRU. JUSTICE  R. SUBBIAH           ::      PRESIDENT                       

                                                         Thiru.R VENKATESA PERUMAL                     ::      MEMBER

 

 CC. No. 94/2013

                                                                       DATED THIS THE 27^th  DAY OF JULY 2022

 

Mr.G.Daniel Thomas,

S/o. Gurubadham,

No.3/37, Malligai street,

Moulivakkam, porur,

Chennai – 600 116                                                               ..complainant

                                                   Vs 

 

1.Vijaya Medical and Educational Trust,

Represented by its Managing Trustee,

 

2. Vijaya Hospitals

Represented by its Chairman

 

3. Dr.D.Janardhana Reddy,

Chief Cardiothoracic Surgeon,

 

4. Dr.K.V.Muralidharan,

Senior Cardiothoracic Surgeon,

 

5. Dr.Paul Ponraj,

Dr.P.Balasubramanian,

7.Dr.Om Prakash

 

8. Ms.Thene

Scrub Nurse,

 

All at No.180, N.S.K.Road,

Vadapalani, Chennai 600 026                                       ..opposite parties

 

Counsel for the complainant                       : M/s S.Bharath  

Counsel for the opposite parties 1 to 8        : M/s J.Dharmarajan

 

          This complaint is coming on before us for hearing today, this commission made the following order in open court :

                                              Docket order

          No representation for the complainant. Opposite parties present and ready. This complaint is posted today for appearance of both and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 11.00 A.M, the complainant was not present, hence passed over and called again at 12.30 noon, then also the complainant has not appeared. Hence we are of the view that keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the complainant is not interested in prosecuting the case. The complaint is dismissed for default. No order as to cost.

Sd/-                                                                                                                  Sd/-

R VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                       R.SUBBIAH

MEMBER                                                                                                   PRESIDENT