Mysuru Urban Development Authority, Petitioner herein has approached  this Commission by filing the present Revision Petition under Section 58 (1) (b) of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, against the Order dated 12.01.2022, passed by the Karnataka State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Bengaluru (Additional Bench) hereinafter referred to as the State Commission, wherein the Appeal preferred by the Complainant/ Respondent herein was allowed and certain directions were given. I have heard Mr. Gopal Singh, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Mr. Siddhartha Iyer, learned Counsel for the Complainant/ Respondent and have perused the impugned order dated 12.01.2022, passed by the State Commission. The grievance of the learned Counsel for the Petitioner is to the facts recorded in Paragraph No. 8 of the impugned Order, wherein the learned Counsel for the Complaint, who had appeared before the State Commission had stated that the Original site bearing No. 2558/e measuring 30 X 40 ft. situated at Devanoor Extension, 3^rd Stage, Mysore  has not been re-allotted to any other person and is still vacant, which is strongly been disputed by Mr. Gopal Singh, learned Counsel for the Petitioner. Be that it may, as before the State Commission nobody had appeared for the Petitioner herein and the matter proceeded ex parte. It would be appropriate and in the interest of justice, that Paragraph No. 8 of the impugned Order be set aside and the State Commission be directed to decide the matter afresh at this issue alone.

The impugned order dated 12.01.2022 is accordingly set aside to the extent indicated above. The Parties shall appear before the State Commission on 25.04.2023.

The First Appeal is disposed of with the aforenoted directions.