Kerala

Kasaragod

CC/12/253

Aravind - Complainant(s)

Versus

Videocon Industries Ltd - Opp.Party(s)

K.Srikantha Shetty, Kasaragod

03 Apr 2013

ORDER

 
Complaint Case No. CC/12/253
 
1. Aravind
S/o.Late.Narayanan.A, R/at Sugandhi, J.P. Nagar, Parakatta, Po.RD.Nagar, Kasaragod. 671125
Kasaragod
Kerala
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Videocon Industries Ltd
3-6-430, 2nd floor, Maithgai Mansion 4th Street, Himayath nagar, Hyderabad.29
Hyderabad
Hyderabad
2. Anuradha Agencies
Bank Road, Kasaragod.671121
Kasaragod
Kerala
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq PRESIDENT
 HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G. MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
 
ORDER

 

            SRI.K.T.SIDHIQ, PRESIDENT

 

            The grievance of the complainant is that opposite parties committed inordinate delay in servicing the Kenstar Split air conditioner  that he purchased from opposite party on 11-03-2010 which was having one year full warranty  and extended additional warranty of 4 years to the compressor. According to him the split air conditioner was taken for repair in May 2012 but they serviced and returned the unit only in December 2012 and as a result he suffered.

2.          Opposite party No.1 did not file any version.  However during enquiry the representative of opposite party No.1 submitted that the delay in service is occurred due to the non-availability of the spare parts, but after replacing the compressor   gas is filled free of cost which is otherwise chargeable.

3.         Opposite party No.2 filed version stating that they are the dealers of air conditioner and the complaints/defaults are to be looked after by a separate authorized service franchisee.

4.         Complainant filed proof affidavit and Exts A1 & A2 marked.  Both sides heard. During hearing the representative of opposite party No.1 submitted that there was no willful laches on their part to  service the Air Conditioner unit   of the complainant and it was caused only because of the non-availability of spare parts.  He further stated that the gas is filled in the air conditioner free of cost which was otherwise chargeable to the tune if Rs.1500/-.

5.         In view of the above we  are not inclined to award any compensation to the complainant.

            Hence the complaint is dismissed with no order as to costs.

      Sd/-                                                                                                            Sd/-

MEMBER                                                                                                   PRESIDENT

Exts.

A1. Photocopy of Retail Invoice cash bill

A2. Photocopy of Installation Mannual

 

       Sd/-                                                                                                              Sd/-

MEMBER                                                                                                    PRESIDENT

Pj/                                                                                Forwarded by Order

 

                                                                        SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

 
 
[HON'ABLE MR. K.T.Sidhiq]
PRESIDENT
 
[HONABLE MRS. Beena.K.G.]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.