Telangana

Nalgonda

CC/160/2014

Panthangi Renuka - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vice Chairman & Housing commissioner Telanganan Housing Board - Opp.Party(s)

M.Narsimha Reddy

28 Aug 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM
NALGONDA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/160/2014
 
1. Panthangi Renuka
Budumarlapally Vilage , Kanagal Mandal
Nalgonda
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Vice Chairman & Housing commissioner Telanganan Housing Board
Gruhakalpa, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad
Hyderabad
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI K.A.P.SWAMY PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy Member
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

 

      BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT NALGONDA

 

            PRESENT:  SRI K.A.P.SWAMY,

                              PRL.DISTRICT JUDGE,

                             I/C PRESIDENT.

 

                    SRI K.VINODH REDDY,

                             MEMBER.

 

. . .

 

FRIDAY, THE TWENTY EIGHTH DAY OF AUGUST, 2015

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT No.160 OF 2014

                                          

                       

Between:

 

    Panthangi Renuka W/o Saidulu, Age: 30 years,

    Occ: Housewife, R/o Budumarlapally Village of Kanagal Mandal,

    Nalgonda District.

 

                                                                        …COMPLAINANT.

 

 

 

AND

 

 

 

1. Vice Chairman and Housing Commissioner, Telangana Housing

    Board, Gruhakalpa, M.J. Road, Nampally, Hyderabad.

 

2. Executive Engineer (Housing), Telangana Housing Board,

    Mahaboobnagar Division, D.No.5-84/3, Syed’s Complex, 1st Floor,

    Yerugonda, Mahaboobnagar Town.

 

                                                               …OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

 

        This complaint  coming on before us for final hearing on this day, in the presence of Sri M.Narsimha Reddy, Advocate for the Complainant, and Sri N.Narsimha Reddy, Advocate for the Opposite Parties, and on perusing the material papers on record,  the Forum passed the following:

ORDER

 

        In view of the memo filed by the Complainant, this case is suo-motu advanced to this date.  Both counsel present.  Counsel for the Complainant filed a Memo stating that he is not pressing the complaint.  The counsel for the Opposite Parties reported no objection.  Hence, this complaint is dismissed as not pressed.

 

Dictated to Steno-Typist, transcribed by him, corrected and pronounced by us in the open Forum on this 28th day of August, 2015.

 

 

 

 

MEMBER                                                                 I/C PRESIDENT

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SRI K.A.P.SWAMY]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy]
Member

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.