Telangana

Nalgonda

CC/99/2014

SUNKIREDDY VEMA REDDY - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vice Chairman and Housing Commissioner, Telangana Housing Board - Opp.Party(s)

30 Jan 2015

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM
NALGONDA
 
Complaint Case No. CC/99/2014
 
1. SUNKIREDDY VEMA REDDY
Dorepally Village of Kanagal Mandal, Nalgonda
Nalgonda
Telangana
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Vice Chairman and Housing Commissioner, Telangana Housing Board
Gruhakalpa, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad
Nalgonda
Telangana
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy PRESIDING MEMBER
 
For the Complainant:
For the Opp. Party:
ORDER

    BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER FORUM AT NALGONDA

 

       PRESENT:  SRI G.PRATHAP KUMAR,

                       FAC PRESIDENT.

                                                                               

                       SMT.CH.A.LATHA KUMARI,

                       MEMBER.

 

                       SRI K.VINODH REDDY,

                       MEMBER.

 

. . .

 

WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JANUARY, 2015

 

CONSUMER COMPLAINT No. 99 OF 2014

 

Between: 

 

     Sunki Reddy Vema Reddy S/o Bixam Reddy , Aged: 36 years,

     Occ: Agriculture , R/o dorepally Village, Kanagal Mandal,

     Nalgonda District.

                                                                                                         …Complainant.

 

                                                And

 

 

 

1) Vice Chairman and Housing Commissioner, Telangana Housing

    Board, Gruhakalpa, M.J.Road, Nampally, Hyderabad.

 

2) Executive Engineer (Housing), Telangana Housing Board,

    Mahaboobnagar Division, D.No.5-84/3, Syed’s Complex,

    1st Floor, Yenugonda, Mahaboobnagar Town.

 

                                                                                               …OPPOSITE PARTIES.

 

 

        This complaint  coming on before us for final hearing on this day, in the presence of Sri M.Narsimha Reddy, Advocate for the Complainant,  and Sri N.Narsimha Reddy, Advocate for the Opposite Parties No.1 and 2, and  on perusing the material papers on record, the Forum passed the following:

 

 

ORDER

 

        I.A.No.06/2015 allowed and the C.C. is advanced from 11/02/2015 to today.  Complainant present, memo filed as not pressed the complaint.  Counsel for the Complainant identified the Complainant.  In view of the memo filed by the Complainant, the C.C. is dismissed as not pressed.

 

 

Written and corrected by me and pronounced by us in the open Forum  on this 21st day of January, 2015.

 

 

 

 

MEMBER                             MEMBER                        FAC PRESIDENT

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. K.Vinodh Reddy]
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.