Today is fixed for hearing of this R.A. case.

Ld. Advocate for the applicant side is present.

Ld. Lawyer of the op no. 4 iis also present.

Heard both side. Considered submission. Perused the review application which is filed u/s 40 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

On close examination of the said review application is appears that the complainant/ applicant side is intending to rectify one mistake/ error which has been cropped up due to inadvertence at point no. 8 of page 10 of the judgement and it has been prayed that in place of “Buroshibtala”  the word  “Bunokalitala” is to be inserted.

The contesting op has given consent in the matter of rectifying the said error. Moreso, the said error has been cropped up due to inadvertence and unwillingly. For that reason the said error can be rectified.

So, this R.A.  case no. 18 of 2022 is allowed.

Let the word “Buroshibtala” be deleted in point no. 8 of page 10 and  in place  of “Buroshibtala” let the word “Bunokalitala” be inserted.

Let the judgement passed in C.C. case no. 48 of 2017 be rectified to this extent.

In the light of the observation made above this R.A. case is disposed of.