Telangana

StateCommission

FA/318/2013

1. HDFC Bank Ltd - Complainant(s)

Versus

Veparu Srinivasulu - Opp.Party(s)

M/s. P.Prasad & Associates

31 Oct 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
First Appeal No. FA/318/2013
(Arisen out of Order Dated 19/02/2013 in Case No. CC/86/2012 of District Mahbubnagar)
 
1. 1. HDFC Bank Ltd
Rep. by its Branch Manager, 4th Floor, Lala Land Mark, No.5-4-94to 97, Ranigunj, M.G. Road, Secunderabad.
2. 2. HDFC Bank Ltd., Rep. by its Branch Manager Kaladi Complex, Govt. Hospital Road, New Town
Mahabubnagar.
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Veparu Srinivasulu
S/o. Hanmappa, Age 50 Years, Occupation Agriculture, R/o. H.No. 1-50, Kotakonda Village, Narayanpet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO JUDICIAL MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 31 Oct 2016
Final Order / Judgement

BEFORE THE TELANGANS STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COIMMISSION : at Hyderabad

FA 318 of 2013

Against

CC No. 86 of 2012, District Forum, Mahabubnagar District

 

Between:

  1. HDFC Bank Ltd,

Rep. by its Branch Manager

            4th floor, Lala Land Mark, No 5-4-94 to 97,

            Ranigunj, M.G. Road, Secunderabad.

 

  1. HDFC Bank Ltd, rep. by its Branch Manager.

Kaladi complex, Govt. Hospital road, Newtown,

Mahabubnagar                                                        ..Appellants/opposite parties

 

And

 

  1. Vepuru Srinivasulu, S/o Hanmappa,

Age 50 years, Occ : Agriculture,

R/o H.No. 1-520, Kotakonda village

Narayanapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar district

( died  )

 

  1. Smt. Vepuru Kousalya, W/o Late Vepuru Srinivasulu

Aged about 52years, Occ : House wife

R/o H.No. 1-50, Kotakonda village,

Narayanapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

 

  1. Sri Vepuru Narsi Reddy, S/o Late Vepuru Srinivasulu

Aged about 40 years, Occ : Agriculture,

R/o H.No. 1-50, Kotakonda village,

Narayanapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

 

  1. Sri Vepuru Subbaiah, S/o Late Vepuru Srinivasulu

Aged about 36 years, Occ : Agriculture,

R/o H.No. 1-50, Kotakonda village,

Narayanapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

 

  1. Sri Vepuru Raghu S/o Late Vepuru Srinivasulu

Aged about 32 years, Occ : Agriculture,

R/o H.No. 1-50, Kotakonda village,

Narayanapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District.

 

  1. Sri Vepuru Narender, S/o Late Vepuru Srinivasulu

Aged about 28 years, Occ : Agriculture,

R/o H.No. 1-50, Kotakonda village,

Narayanapet Mandal, Mahabubnagar District…..respondents

 

( Respondents No. 2 to 6 are impleaded as Legal heirs of the deceased

Respondent No.1/complainant vide orders dated 08.10.2014,

  In IA No. 1997 of 2016)

           

 

 

 

 

 

Counsel for the Appellant                                      :           M/s.Lotus Law Associates

 

Counsel for the Respondent                                 :           M/s.K. Sudershan

.

 

Coram :          HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA, HON’BLE PRESIDENT

 

                                                                                    And

 

                                                SRI PATIL VITTAL RAO, MEMBER

 

Monday, the Thirty First Day of October

TWO THOUSAND SIXTEEN

           

                         Oral order: ( Per Hon’ble Sri Justice B. N. Rao Nalla, President )

 

                                                            *******

 

  1. This is an appeal filed by the opposite parties  against the orders of the District Forum, Mahabubnagar in CC 86 of 2012 and as the complainant died, Respondents No. 2 to 6 were impleaded as Legal heirs of the deceased Respondent No.1/complainant vide orders dated 08.10.2014  In IA No. 1997 of 2016.

 

  1. Heard the Counsel for the appellants and she had filed Joint Compromise  Memo submitting that the matter was settled out of Court amicably by and between the parties and the respondents 2 to 6 received an amount of Rs.1,00,000/- ( Rupees One Lakh only ) @ Rs.20,000/- each by way of demand drafts from the appellants towards full and final satisfaction and thus prayed to permit them to withdraw the appeal.

 

 

  1. In the above facts and circumstances, Memo is  recorded and the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. No costs.

 

 

PRESIDENT            MEMBER

            DATED : 31.10.2016

 

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Sri. PATIL VITHAL RAO]
JUDICIAL MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.