BEFORE THE A.P STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION AT HYDERABAD.
R.P.No.54/2010 against I.A.No.116/2010 in C.C.173/2009, Dist. Forum, Ranga Reddy District
Between:
M/s.Mansani Constructions Pvt. Ltd.,
10-1-88/A, Vardhan Complex,
Opp:Yadava Reddy Gardens,
Karmanghat ‘X’ Road,
Sagar Road, Saroornagar,
Hyderabad. Rep. by its
Managing Director. *** Rev Petitioner/
Opposite Party
And
Vemula Ramesh S/o.V.Krishna,
Aged about 30 years,
Occ:Engineer, R/o.H.No.11-3-152/1/A,
Mahmoodguda, Warasiguda,
Secunderabad-500 061. *** Respondent/
Complainant
Counsel for the Petitioner M/s. V.Gourisankara Rao
Counsel for the Respondent: -Party in person
CORAM:
SMT. M.SHREESHA, MEMBER.
and
SRI SYED ABDULLAH, MEMBER
THIS THE 19th DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND TEN
ORAL ORDER: (Per Smt. M.Shreesha, Hon’ble Member.)
***
Heard the learned counsel for the revision petitioner. Respondent, party in person, present.
This is a revision preferred against the order in I.A.No.116/2010 in C.C.No.173/2009 in which the District Forum has set the opposite party exparte.
The learned counsel for the revision petitioner submitted that due to severe traffic jam on that day, the petitioner could not attend the District Forum and his non appearance is neither willful nor deliberate and hence prayed to allow the revision and set aside the exparte order.
The respondent resisted the same, however, keeping in view the principles of natural justice, we deem it fit to set aside the exparte order. since there are latches on behalf of the petitioner, on payment of costs of Rs.1,000/- to the respondent.
In the result this revision petition is allowed directing the counsel for the petitioner to pay costs of Rs.1,000/- to the respondent on 25-11-2010 and also file his written version in C.C. 173/2009 on the very same day. The District Forum is also directed to dispose of the C.D. within 3 months after giving opportunity to both sides to adduce evidence and arguments from that day.
Sd/-MEMBER.
Sd/MEMBER.
JM Dt.19-11-2010