Haryana

StateCommission

RP/17/2016

CLEARTRIP PVT.LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

VED PRAKASH GUPTA - Opp.Party(s)

PALLAVI SINGH

17 Feb 2016

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION HARYANA, PANCHKULA

                                                 

 

Revision Petition No:   17 of 2016

                                                Date of Institution:        10.02.2016

                                                Date of Decision :         17.02.2016

 

M/s Cleartrip Private Limited having registered office at Unit No.001, Ground Floor, DTC Building, Sitaram Mills Compound, Lower Parel, Mumbai – 400 011 and also having office at 315/316, Third Floor, Vipul Agora Building, Sector 28 Next to Sahara Mall, M.G. Road, Gurgaon, Haryana.

                                      Petitioner-Opposite Party

Versus

 

Ved Parkash Gupta s/o late Sh. Sukh Dev Gupta, r/o House No.967, Sector 11, Panchkula, Haryana.

                                      Respondent-Complainant

 

 

CORAM:             Hon’ble Mr. Justice Nawab Singh, President.

                             Shri B.M. Bedi, Judicial Member.

 

                                                                                                                  

Present:               Ms. Pallavi Singh, Advocate for petitioner.

                             Sh. Ved Parkash Gupta, respondent-complainant in person   

           

                                                   O R D E R

 

NAWAB SINGH J.(ORAL)

 

          M/s Cleartrip Private Limited -opposite party (petitioner herein) has filed the instant revision petition against the order dated December 15^th, 2015 passed by District Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Panchkula (for short District Forum) whereby the petitioner was proceeded ex parte.

2.      Learned counsel for the petitioner has urged that the impugned order be set aside; opportunity be granted to the petitioner to file reply and contest the complaint. The next date of hearing before the District Forum is February 25^th, 2016.

 

3.      Sh. Ved Parkash Gupta-complainant has stated that he has no objection if the impugned order is set aside. 

4.      In view of above, this revision petition is accepted and the impugned order is set aside. The petitioner is accorded opportunity to file reply and join the proceedings.

5.      Copy of this order be sent to the District Forum.

 

 

Announced 17.02.2016

(B.M. Bedi) Judicial Member

(Nawab Singh) President

UK