Haryana

Ambala

CC/341/2022

M/S M.U.A REAL ESTATE PVT.LTD. - Complainant(s)

Versus

VATIKA LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

BHUPESH SHARMA

27 Sep 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

                                                          Complaint case no.         :    341 of 2022.

                                                          Date of Institution           :    05.09.2022.

                                                          Date of decision     :    27.09.2022.

 

M/s M.U.A Real Estate Private Limited # SCO 35, Ist Floor, Madhya Marg, Sector-26, Chandigarh through General Power of attorney Shri Anish Aggarwal son of Late Rajinder Aggarwal, aged about 42 years, resident of House No.938, Sector-7, Urban Estate Ambala City.

          ……. Complainant.

                                                Versus

1.  Vatika Limited, Sector-23, Ambala City, through its General Manager K.P.Mishra.

2.  Vatika Limited, Vatika Triangle, Sushant Block-A, Mehrauli, Gurugram Road,    Grurgram-122002 through its General Manager-Amit Malhotra.

3.  Anil Bhalla, Chairman, Vatika Limited, Vatika Triangle, Sushant Block-A,          Mehrauli, Gurugram Road, Gurugram-122002.

4.  Gautam Bhalla, Director, Vatika Limited, Vatika Triangle, Sushant Block-A,        Mehrauli, Gurugram Road, Gurugram-122002.

5.  Kunal, Manager, Vatika Limited Vatika Triangle, Sushant Block-A, Mehrauli,      Gurugram Road, Gurugram-122002.

 

                                                                                  ….…. Opposite Parties.      

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member,

Sh. Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member.          

                            

Present:       None for the complainant.

         

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order:-       Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for consideration on the admissibility of complaint, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that even on the last date of hearing i.e. 21.09.2022, none appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant. It is already 04:00 P.M. Further wait is not justified. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the complainant free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced:-27.09.2022.

 

 

Member                         Member                                   President

               DCDRC, Ambala