View 363 Cases Against Chemical
NAGARJUNA FERTILIZER AND CHEMICAL COMPANY LIMITED, THE PRESIDENT filed a consumer case on 17 Aug 2015 against VASUDEVAN in the StateCommission Consumer Court. The case no is FA/673/2012 and the judgment uploaded on 26 Aug 2015.
BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI
BEFORE Thiru. J.JAYARAM PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER
Tmt. P. BAKIYAVATHI MEMBER
F.A.NO. 673/2012
[Against the Order in C.C.No. 104/2010 dated 30.3.2011 on the file of the DCDRF, Nagapattinam]
DATED THIS THE 17th DAY OF AUGUST 2015
1. The President
Nagarjuna Fertilizer and Chemical
Company Limited,
Plot No.B-10/1, IDA,Necharam
Hyderabad
2. The Assistant President and Secretary
Nagarjuna Fertilizer and Chemical
Company Limited,
Plot No.B-10/1, IDA,Necharam
Hyderabad
3. Area Manager
Nagarjuna Fertilizer and Chemical
Company Limited,
1202, Anna Nagar West,
Mugappair, Chennai-50
4. Regional Manager
Nagarjuna Fertilizer and Chemical
Company Limited,
Tiruchy – 06 ..Appellants/1 to 4 opp.parties
Vs
1. Vasudevan
Rep.by his Power of Attorney holder
Aravumudan
S/o Duraiswamy,
Sirgazhi Taluk
Nagapattinam District ..1st Respondent/complainant
2. Agriculture Development Officer
Kollidam
Sirgazhi Taluk
Nagapattinam District .. 2nd Respondent/ 5th opp.party
3. Shankar
Owner of Dhanam Ackrotek
Sirgazhi Taluk
Nagapattinam District ..3rd Respondent/6th opp.party
Counsel for the Appellants/1 to 4 opposite parties : M/s Satish Parasaran
Counsel for the 1st Respondent/complainant : M/s G.Thiyagarajan
2nd Respondent & 3rd Respondent : Served called absent
This appeal is coming up before us for final hearing on 23.7.2015 and on hearing the arguments of both sides and upon perusing the arguments of both sides and upon perusing the material records, this Commission made the following Order
J. JAYARAM, PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER
1. This appeal is filed by the opposite parties 1 to 4 against the order of the District Forum, Nagapattinam in C.C. No. 104/ 2010, dated 30-03-2011, allowing the complaint.
2. The complainant has filed the complaint against the opposite parties 1 to 6 claiming compensation alleging monetary loss and loss caused to the crop raised in his land by adopting Drip Irrigation System provided by the opposite parties.
3. The opposite parties 1 to 4 and 6 did not appear before the District Forum, and they were set exparte and an exparte order was passed against them by the District Forum.
4. This appeal is filed to set aside the exparte order passed by the District Forum.
5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, we feel that an opportunity should be afforded to the appellants for proper adjudication of the case and to meet the ends of justice.
In the result, the appeal is allowed and the order of the District Forum is set aside and the case is remanded to the District Forum for proper enquiry and fresh disposal, on condition that the appellants 1 to 4 pay costs of Rs.5,000/- (Rupees Five Thousand only) each to the complainant on or before 25-08-2015, failing which, the appeal shall stand dismissed.
Both the parties are directed to appear before the District Forum on 26-08-2015. The appellants shall file their version, and proof affidavit, along with documents if any on that day itself.
The District Forum is directed to dispose of the case within three months from the date of appearance of the parties before the Forum.
TMT. P. BAKIYAVATHI J. JAYARAM
MEMBER PRESIDING JUDICIAL MEMBER
Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes
Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.