Kerala

Idukki

CC/126/2018

Joby Abraham - Complainant(s)

Versus

Varkey Abraham - Opp.Party(s)

Adv.Eby Thomas

13 Jan 2022

ORDER

DATE OF FILING :26/06/2018

IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, IDUKKI

Dated this the 13th day of January 2022

Present :

SRI.C.SURESHKUMAR PRESIDENT

SMT.ASAMOL P. MEMBER

SRI.AMPADY K.S. MEMBER

 

CC NO.126/2018

 

Between

Complainant : Joby Abraham,

Ayyamala House,

Moonkippallam Kara, Manthippara.

(By Adv.Eby Thomas)

And

Opposite Party : 1 . Jomon Thomas, Panackal House,

President, Cherupushpam SHG, Palakkandam,

Nettithozhu P.O., Palakkandam Kara.

2 . Varcky Abraham, Valiyamannoor,

Secretary, Cherupushpam SHG, Palakkandam,

Nettithozhu P.O., Palakkandam Kara.

3 . T.D.Mohandas, Thuruthel House,

Former President, Cherupushpam SHG, Palakkandam,

Nettithozhu P.O., Palakkandam Kara.

4 . N.A.Chacko, Nankulath House,

Former Secretary, Cherupushpam SHG, Palakkandam,

Nettithozhu P.O., Palakkandam Kara.

5 . P.S.Thomas, Parakkuzhiyil House,

Cherupushpam SHG, Palakkandam,

Nettithozhu P.O., Palakkandam Kara.

6 . P.S.Cheriyan, Parakkuzhiyil House,

Cherupushpam SHG, Palakkandam,

Nettithozhu P.O., Palakkandam Kara.

 

 

 

 

 

 

(Cont....2)

-2-

 

O R D E R

 

SRI.C.SURESHKUMAR, PRESIDENT

 

Complainant absent. Representing counsel filed an application seeking adjournment stating that counsel is laid up. Opposite parties absent, represented. Proceedings reveal that on 05/03/2021, 28/07/2021, 09/11/2021, 19/11/2021 and 15/12/2021 case was posted for complainant's evidence. There were specific directions for appearance of complainant on 09/11/2021, 15/12/2021 and 13/01/2022. Yet he has not appeared. Present application by counsel that he is laid up owing to fever and therefore case has to be adjourned for evidence does not give any reason for non appearance of complainant. Hence we are not inclined to grant any further adjournment for evidence. This case is of the year 2018. It is evident from the proceedings that the complainant is adopting dilatory tactics, to protract the proceedings. Presence and evidence by complainant is necessary for proceeding further. As he is shying away from giving evidence, this commission is unable to proceed further with this complaint. Hence complaint is dismissed for default, albeit without costs.

 

Pronounced by this Commission on this the 13th day of January , 2022.

 

 

Sd/-

SRI.C.SURESHKUMAR, PRESIDENT

Sd/-

SMT.ASAMOL P., MEMBER

Sd/-

SRI.AMPADY K.S., MEMBER

 

Forwarded by Order

 

 

SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT

 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.