Delhi

West Delhi

CC/16/642

SHALENDRA SINGH - Complainant(s)

Versus

VARDHMAN BUILD - Opp.Party(s)

05 May 2017

ORDER

                   CC-642/16                                      D.O.O- 05.05.2017

Present :-          Mrs. Pooja Bhatia advocate for complainant.

                   None for OP.

          Opposite party failed to file reply and pay conditional costs.Herd.Perused. Complainant has place on record schedule of payment. As per the schedule of payment total price of the Flat is Rs.37,59,600/-. Hon’ble National Commission in order dated 07.10.2016 passed in appeal no.644/2015 titled ParikshitParashar V/S M/S Universal BuildwellPvt.Ltd. and othersheld that for the total value of the flat is to be seenFor the purpose of pecuniary jurisdiction.

          Therefore, in view of law laid down by the Hon’ble National Commission inParikshitParashar’s case (supra) this forum has not pecuniary jurisdiction to decide this complaint.

          Therefore, complaint is returned to the complainant for presentation before the competent forum of jurisdiction. File be consigned to record room.

                   

.              

                        (PUNEET LAMBA)                                                              ( R.S.  BAGRI )

MEMBER                                                                  PRESIDENT

                                05.05.2017                                                                                  05.05.2017

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.