Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

CC/98/2013

LAXMI - Complainant(s)

Versus

VARALAKSHMI SRINIVASAN - Opp.Party(s)

R.K. RAMAIH

28 Oct 2021

ORDER

BEFORE THE STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE       Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                            PRESIDENT

                       Tmt. Dr. S. M. LATHA MAHESWARI                           MEMBER

                                                                           C.C. No.98/2013

                                               DATED THE 28^th   DAY OF OCTOBER 2021                                                        

Mrs. Laxmi, F/23 years,

W/o Gopinath @ Seenu,

No.5, Water Board Colony,

Kannathasan Nagar,

                                                                               -Vs-

 

1. Dr. Mrs. Varalakshmi Srinivasan MBBS., DGO,

           NARAYANA HOSPITAL

            #18, Tana Street,

            Chennai-07.

2. Dr. Mrs. S. Geetha Thirupathy Raja, MBBS.,

           PG, DIP (Ultrasonography)

           #325, West Avenue,

           M.K.B. Nagar,

           Chennai-600 039.

3. Dr. M. Madhavan MD Path.,

          No.8, 1^st Street, Bakthavachalapuram,

          Avadi, Chennai-54.

4. Dr. Laxmanan Saravanan, (Consultant),

          Dr. Mahalxmi / Dr. Asoke(Surgeon),

          22/2, E.S.I. hospital Road,

           Peruvallur (Perambur)

Counsel for the complainant             : M/s. R.K. Ramaiah

Counsel for 2^nd Opposite party         : M/s. Dr.B. Cherann,  Nagarathinam

Counsel for 1^st Oppoiste party          : M/s. V. Ramakrishnan                                         

Docket order

          2^nd Opposite party present. No representation for Complainant and 1^st opposite party.  This complaint is posted today for the appearance of complainant and 1^st opposite party and for arguments in list or for dismissal. When the matter was called at 10.30 a.m the complainant and 1^st opposite party  did not appear, hence  passed over and  called again at 12.15 pm, then also there is no representation for complainant and 1^st opposite party. Though it is specifically posted today for arguments in the list or for dismissal, the parties  remained absent. Hence keeping the complaint pending is of no use as the parties is not interested in prosecuting the case.

Hence the complaint  is dismissed for default.  No order as to cost.

 

              Sd/-                                                                                                                  Sd/-

S.M.LATHAMAHESWARI                                                                                 R.SUBBIAH    

               MEMBER                                                                                               PRESIDENT