Telangana

StateCommission

FA/616/2013

Institute of Clinical Research India - Complainant(s)

Versus

Vandama Malladi - Opp.Party(s)

M/s.Deepak Sabharwal and Associates Mr.K. Rajeshwar Rao M/s.KRR. Associates

20 Nov 2015

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
Telangana
 
First Appeal No. FA/616/2013
(Arisen out of Order Dated 29/08/2013 in Case No. CC/279/2010 of District Hyderabad)
 
1. Institute of Clinical Research India
Rep. by its Managing Director, Having its Hyderabad Office at 1-10-3/2, Cargo Office Building, Opp Old Air Port, Behid Bottles & Chimney, Prakash Nagar
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Vandama Malladi
Age 32 Years, D/o. M.Vedagiri, 16-2-836/75, Madhav Nagar, Saidabad Colony, Hyderabad-500 059
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA PRESIDENT
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
ORDER

TELANGANA STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION :

AT HYDERABAD

 

FA NO. 616 OF 2013 against CC 279/2010

on the file of DCF-I, Hyderabad

 

Between :

 

Institute of Clinical Research (India),

Rep. by its Managing Director,

Having its Hyderabad office at 1-10-3/2,

Cargo Office Building, Opp: Old Airport,

Behind Bottles & Chimney,

Prakash Nagar, Begumpet, Hyderabad-16.

Appellant/Opposite party

 

And

 

Vandana Malladi D/o M.Vedagiri,

Aged 32 years, 16-2-836/75,

Madhav Nagar, Saidabad Colony,

Hyderabad – 500 059.

Respondent/Complainant

 

Counsel for the Appellant                             :        M/s Deepak Sabharwal & Associates &

                                                                   M/s K.Rajeshwar Rao.

Counsel for the Respondent               :        M/s Ravi Teja Paidiri

 

Coram                  :

 

Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla  …      President

 

Friday, the Twentieth day of November

Two thousand Fifteen

 

Oral Order : (per Hon’ble Sri Justice B.N.Rao Nalla, Hon’ble President)

 

***

 

 

          Against the orders dated 29.08.2012 passed in CC No.279/2010 by the District Consumer Forum-I, Hyderabad, the Opposite party therein has approached this Commission and filed this appeal i.e., FA 616/2013.  During the pendency of this appeal, it appears that the parties have amicably settled their dispute and in that regard a joint memo is filed by the Appellant/Opposite party stating that the matter is settled out of court.  In the light of the said submission, the court looked into the joint memo signed by the parties.

 

2.       Counsel for the Appellant/Opposite party herein is present.  When he was questioned, he, in unequivocal terms stated that Appellant got the matter settled out of court for Rs.1,50,000/- towards full and final satisfaction of the claim and the Respondent/Complainant stated to have received a sum of Rs.1,25,000/- through demand draft bearing No.284013 dated 09.09.2015 drawn on Vijaya Bank, Defence Colony branch, New Delhi towards full and final settlement of her entire dues as awarded by the District Consumer Forum, Hyderabad in CC No.279/2010 excluding the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- lying to the credit of above appeal and that the Appellant herein has no objection in withdrawing the statutory amount of Rs.25,000/- by the Respondent herein.

 

3.       Heard.  Perused the memo.

 

4.       In the circumstances stated above, this matter is closed as settled out of court.

 

PRESIDENT

 

 

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B. N. RAO NALLA]
PRESIDENT

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.