D.O.F. 21.07.2012 D.O.O. 11.10.2012 IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM KANNUR Present: Sri. K.Gopalan : President Smt. K.P.Preethakumari : Member Smt. M.D.Jessy : Member Dated this the 11th day of October, 2012. C.C.No.213/2012 P.C. Soumini, W/o. K.P. Purushothaman, ‘Janaki Ram Sadan’, P.O. Vadakkumbad, : Complainant Thalassery, Kannur – 670109. (Rep. by Adv. Subash Chandran) 1. Vadakkumbad Service Co-op. Bank, P.O. Vadakkumbad, Thalassery – 670109 2. The Managing Director, : Opposite Parties Kerala State Co-operative Consumer Federation, Gandhi Nagar, Cochin. O R D E R Smt. M.D. Jessy, Member This is a complaint filed under Section 12 of Consumer Protection Act for getting an order directing the opposite parties to refund ` 5750 together with interest. As per the averments in the complaint, the complainant’s husband has taken cooking gas connection from opposite parties through 1st opposite party, Vadakkumbad Service Co-operative Bank. The distribution of gas connection is a joint effort of all opposite parties. Complainant’s husband paid `5750 at the time of taking the connection and he was then assured by the 1st opposite party that the amount would be refunded when the equipments are returned. Since the gas distribution become irregular along with high increase of price of gas, the complainant constrained to surrender the equipments and disconnecting the gas connection. Even after surrendering the equipments opposite party did not take care to refund the amount. Hence this complaint. After receiving the complaint Forum sent notices to both sides. 2nd opposite party sent their version. Opposite party filed their version contending that at the time of giving cooking gas connection Consumerfed had received ` 5750 from all the consumers including the complainant in this O.P. Out of this amount ` 5500 was given to Koldy Petroleum India Ltd and ` 100 to primary societies through which connection was availed and Consumerfed itself appropriated ` 150. As per the agreement with the Koldy Petroleum India Ltd., they supplied two cylinders and one regulator to each consumers. The filled cylinders in a periodical manner were also supplied by Koldy Petroleum India Ltd. They further admit that some delay was caused in supplying refilled gas cylinder which was caused not because of any default committed by 2nd opposite party. So 2nd opposite party is not liable. On the above pleadings the following issues were raised for consideration. 1. Whether there is any deficiency of service on the part of the opposite parties? 2. Whether the complainant is entitled for remedy as prayed in the complaint? 3. Relief and cost? The evidence consists of chief affidavit of the complainant and Ext.A1 to A4 marked. Issue No.1 to 3 : The complainant has stated in the complaint that complainant’s husband has availed gas connection from 1st opposite party by paying an amount of `5750. The complainant was assured that the amount will be refunded at the time when the equipments are surrendered. Ext.A1 is the receipt dated 13.10.2009 which shows that complainant’s husband has paid `5750 for availing gas connection from 1st opposite party. It is the specific case of the complainant that there was deficiency of service on the part of 1st opposite party in supplying gas to the customers. Ext.A2 is the surrendering certificate which shows that complainant has surrendered two cylinders and one regulator to 1st opposite party on 04.07.2012. Ext.A3 is the connection certificate which shows that complainant has taken gas connection from 1st opposite party. Ext.A4 is the certificate which shows that complainant, Soumini was the wife of Purushothaman who has taken gas connection from opposite party. Here all opposite parties are jointly and severally liable to refund `5750 to the complainant. Since the gas distribution become irregular along with high increase of price of gas the complainant constrained to surrender the equipment and disconnecting the gas connection. Even the complainant made oral request to 1st opposite party to refund the security amount, the opposite party failed to comply the same. So there is deficiency of service on the part of opposite party. Hence the complainant is entitled to get refunding of the security amount of ` 5750. Considering the peculiar situation we are avoiding cost and compensation. In the result, the complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund ` 5750 (Rupees Five Thousand Seven Hundred and Fifty only) to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the complainant is entitled to execute the order as per the provisions of Consumer Protection Act. Dated this the 11th day of October, 2012. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- President Member Member APPENDIX Exhibits for the Complainant A1. Certificate of receipt dated 13.10.2009. A2. Certificate dated 04.07.2012. A3. Connection certificate. A4. Relationship certificate. Exhibits for the opposite party Nil Witness examined for the complainant Nil Witness examined for opposite party Nil /forwarded by order/ SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT |