IN THE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, KANNUR Present: Sri.K.Gopalan: President Smt.K.P.Prethakumari: Member Smt.M.D.Jessy: Member Dated this, the 2nd day of February 2010 C.C.No.260/2009 C.Sheeja, Pareth House, P.O.Vadakkumpad, Thalassery Complainant 1. Secretary, Vadakkumpad Service co.op.Bank, P.O.Vadakkumpad. 2. Managing Director, Kerala State Co.op.Consumer Federation, opposite parties Gandhi Nagar, Kochi. . O R D E R Smt.M.D.Jessy, Member This is a complaint filed under section12 of the consumer protection Act for getting an order directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.5750/- with interest and cost. The case of the complainant in brief is as follows: On 27.4.1998 the complainant availed an L.P.Gas connection from 1st opposite party under consumer No.19,. It was informed that 2nd opposite party will have deliver the cylinders through the Neethi store conducted by 1st opposite party. At the time of availing gas connection the 1st opposite party received an amount of Rs.5750/- as deposit for the connection and receipt for the same is issued to the complainant. It was agreed by 1st opposite party that the security amount will be returned to the complainant at the time of surrendering the gas connection. The opposite e parties failed to deliver cylinders promptly and the quality and quantity of the gas is also not correct. Even though the complainant raised objections many times before 1st opposite party they evaded from the liability by saying that 2nd opposite party is responsible for the same. Since the service rendered by the opposite parties are not feasible. The complainant surrendered the gas cylinders before 1st opposite party and requested to return the security amount. But the 1st opposite party did not pay the same stating that the deposit amount was handed over to 2nd opposite party. The opposite parties were not so far returned the security amount to the complainant and the said act amounts deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties. On receiving the complaint, notices were issued to the opposite parties. Even though opposite parties received the notice they have not appeared before the Forum nor even filed their version. Hence the opposite patries were called absent and set exparte. On the above pleadings the following issues were raised for consideration. 1. Whether there is any deficiency in service on the part of the opposite parties? 2. Whether the complainant is entitled for remedy as prayed in the complaint? 3. Relief and cost. The evidence consists of proof affidavit of complainant and Exts.A1 to A3 marked. Issue Nos. 1 to 3 The complainant has stated in the complaint that she has availed gas connection from 1st opposite party by paying an amount of Rs.5750/-. The complainant was assured that the amount would be refunded at the time when the equipments are surrendered. Ext.A1 is the connection certificate. Ext.A2 is the receipts which shows that complainant paid an amount of rs.5750/- pm 27/4/98 towards security deposit for gas connection. Ex.tA3 is the surrendering certificate which shows the complainant had surrendered two cylinders and one regulator to 1st opposite party on 24.4.07. It can be seen from the available evidence that the opposite party failed to issue cooking gas cylinder regularly. If the gas is not available regularly the very purpose of taking connection is meaningless as far as a consumer is concerned. Hence the irregular supply is a clear deficiency in service. The opposite parties are liable to refund the amount of Rs.5750/- to the complainant. Issues 1 to 3 are found partly in favour of complainant. In the result, complaint is allowed directing the opposite parties to refund Rs.5750/-(Rupees Five thousand seven hundred and fifty only) to the complainant within one month from the date of receipt of this order, failing which the complainant is allowed to execute the order against the opposite parties under the provisions of consumer protection Act.. Sd/- Sd/- Sd/- President Member Member APPENDIX Exhibits for the complainant A1 to A3. Receipts issued by OP Exhibits for the opposite parties: Nil Witness examined for either side: Nil /forwarded by order/ Senior Superintendent Consumer Disputes Redressal Forum, Kannur
......................GOPALAN.K ......................JESSY.M.D ......................PREETHAKUMARI.K.P | |