Tamil Nadu

StateCommission

A/124/2023

Tafe Access Ltd. - Complainant(s)

Versus

V.Sreenivasan, S/o G.Venkatasamy & 3 Othrs - Opp.Party(s)

M/s Jayaganeshan

22 Feb 2023

ORDER

IN THE TAMIL NADU STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, CHENNAI – 600 003.

BEFORE          Hon’ble Thiru. Justice R.SUBBIAH                           PRESIDENT

                      Thiru. R. VENKATESAPERUMAL                           MEMBER

 

F.A. No.124/2023

 

(Against the Order dt.22.10.2019 made in C.C. No.03/2014 on the file of

D.C.D.R.C., Dharmapuri @ Krishnagiri)

DATED THE 22^ND DAY OF FEBRUARY 2023

 

Tafe Access Limited,

No.19, Bharani Industrial Estate,

Kudulu Gate, Chik Begur Road,

Hosur Road,

Bangalore – 560 068.                                                 .. Appellant / 4^th Opposite party.

 

-Versus-

1. V. Sreenivasan,

S/o. G. Venkatasamy,

Proprietor,

V.S. Hostels,

No.33-D 1, Bagalur Main Road,

Hosur,

Krishnagiri.                                                             .. 1^st Respondent  / Complainant.

 

2. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd.,

HQ-A1/1, Five Star MIDC,

Shendra,

Aurangabad – 431 201.

                                 

3. Skoda Auto India Pvt. Ltd.,

No.A-605, ICC Towers, SB Road,

Pune.

 

4. The Manager & Authorised Dealer,

S-7 Cars India (Pvt.) Ltd.,

No.555, Meyyanoor Main Road,

Salem.                                                .. 2 to 4 Respondents /  Opposite parties 1 to 3.

 

Counsel for Appellant / 4^th Opposite party   : M/s. K.S. Jayaganeshan

                 

This appeal has been filed by the  Appellant / 4^th Opposite party to set aside the order dt.22.10.2019 made in C.C. No.03/2014 passed by the District Consumer Commission, Dharmapuri @ Krishnagiri and has come before us on 22.02.2023 before us and this Commission made the following Order in open court:                                                                                              

 

Docket Order

 

Appellant/ 4^th Opposite party present.  

When the matter is taken up for consideration, the Counsel for the appellant/ 4^th Opposite party has made an endorsement on the Grounds of Appeal and stated that since the matter has been settled between the parties, he is withdrawing the present appeal.

In view of the endorsement made by the appellant / 4^th opposite party, he is permitted to withdraw the appeal.

Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.   No order as to costs.

The appellant / 4^th opposite party is entitled for the Mandatory deposit.   Hence, the Registry is directed to discharge the mandatory deposit along with accrued interest in favour of the appellant / 4^th opposite party.

 

 

               

                Sd/-                                                                                              Sd/-                                                                        

R.VENKATESAPERUMAL                                                                        R.SUBBIAH                       

             MEMBER                                                                                     PRESIDENT