Tamil Nadu

North Chennai

CC/62/2016

T.Vijay - Complainant(s)

Versus

v.SIVASAMY - Opp.Party(s)

Party In Person

28 Jul 2017

ORDER

                                                                       Complaint presented on:  04.03.2016

                                                                          Order pronounced on:  28.07.2017

 

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM, CHENNAI (NORTH)

      2^nd Floor, Frazer Bridge Road, V.O.C.Nagar, Park Town, Chennai-3

 

       PRESENT: THIRU.K.JAYABALAN, B.Sc., B.L.,         PRESIDENT

                    THIRU. M.UYIRROLI KANNAN B.B.A., B.L.,      MEMBER – I

 

FRIDAY THE 28^th  DAY OF JULY 2017

                                      C.C.NO.62/2016

 

 

T.Vijay,

New No 70 VOC Colony,

Anna Nagar East Chennai – 600 102.

                                                                                   ..... Complainant

 

                                     ..Vs..

 

 

V.Sivasamy,

Deputy Director/ Public Grievances,

General Manager’s Office,

Southern Railway,

Park Town,

Chennai – 600 003.

                                                                        …..Opposite party

 

                                                         

Date of complaint                                             :09.05.2016

Counsel for complainant                        :Party in Person

 

Counsel for  Opposite Parties                           : K.Muthamil Raja

 

 

 

 

 

O R D E R

 

BY PRESIDENT THIRU. K.JAYABALAN B.Sc., B.L.,

          Counsel for opposite party present. This case is pending from 09.09.2016 hearings onwards till date for filing proof affidavit of the complainant for more than 10 months for several hearings. Most of  hearings the complainant  not present. Today it is posted to file the proof affidavit of the complainant as last chance and no further adjournment. However, no proof affidavit  filed by the complainant till 3.30 p.m.   The complainant also called absent. The complainant has not filed the proof affidavit for the past 11 hearings and also today’s hearing, proves that the complainant has no interest in prosecuting this complaint. Hence this complaint is dismissed for default for non-prosecution of the complaint. No costs.

                        Pronounced by us on this 28^th  day of July 2017.

 

      -sd-                                                                                         -sd-      

MEMBER – I                                                                         PRESIDENT