Haryana

Ambala

CC/335/2022

DHANO DEVI. - Complainant(s)

Versus

UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM LTD. - Opp.Party(s)

HARMANJIT SINGH

15 Jun 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, AMBALA.

 

 

                                                          Complaint case no. :      335 of 2022.

                                                          Date of Institution :      22.08.2022.

                                                          Date of decision     :      15.06.2023.

 

 

Dhano Devi wife of Shri Chota Ram, aged about 76 years, resident of Village Laliana, Tehsil Ambala Cantt., District Ambala.

          ……. Complainant.

 

                                                Versus

 

1.  Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, C-16, Vidhut Sadan, Sector-6, Panchkula 134109 Haryana, through its Managing Director.

2.  Sub Divisional Officer (OP) Sub Division Uttri Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Ambala Cantt., District Ambala.

 

                                                                                       ….…. Opposite Parties.       

Before:        Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.  

                   Smt. Ruby Sharma, Member.

                   Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Member             

                            

Present:        None for the complainant.

                   Shri Sandeep Sachdeva, Advocate, counsel for the OPs No.1 and 2.

 

          Complaint under Section 35 of the Consumer Protection Act, 2019

 

Order by:-  Smt. Neena Sandhu, President.

 

          Today, the case was fixed for leading evidence by the complainant, subject to deposit of cost of Rs.400/-, in the legal aid account, but none has appeared on behalf of the complainant. From the perusal of zimni orders, it is revealed that several opportunities have been taken by the complainant to tender evidence. Even from the last two dates of hearing i.e. 25.04.2023 and 08.06.2023, none appeared on behalf of the complainant. Case called several times since morning, but none has appeared on behalf of complainant to deposit the cost and to lead evidence. It appears that the complainant is not interested to pursue the present complaint. Accordingly, the present complaint is dismissed in default for want of prosecution. Certified copy of the order be sent to the parties free of costs as per rules. File be indexed and consigned to record room.

Pronounced: 15.06.2023.

Member                         Member                                 President

                                                                                DCDRC, Ambala