NCDRC

NCDRC

RP/800/2010

MOHAN LAL - Complainant(s)

Versus

UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI NIGAM LTD. & ORS. - Opp.Party(s)

MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL

11 Feb 2011

ORDER

NATIONAL CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
NEW DELHI
 
REVISION PETITION NO. 799 OF 2010
 
(Against the Order dated 11/01/2010 in Appeal No. 2371/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. MOHAN LAL
Resident of Village Jattan, Tehsil Ladwa
Kurukshetra
(Haryana)
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. UTTARI HARYANA BIJLI NIGAM LTD. & ORS.
Through its Chairman, Shakti Bhawan, Sector - 6
Panchkula
(Haryana)
2. THE SUPRINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION
Circle Kurukshetra, UHBVNL
Kurukshetra
(Haryana)
3. THE SDO, OPERATION SUB DIVISION
Ladwa, UHBVNL
Kurukshetra
(Haryana)
...........Respondent(s)
REVISION PETITION NO. 800 OF 2010
 
(Against the Order dated 11/01/2010 in Appeal No. 2598/2004 of the State Commission Haryana)
1. MOHAN LAL
Resident of Village Jattan, Tehsil Ladwa
Kurukshetra
(Haryana)
...........Petitioner(s)
Versus 
1. UTTRI HARYANA BIJLI NIGAM LTD. & ORS.
Through Its Chairman, Shakti Bhawan, Sector - 6
Panchkula
(Haryana)
2. THE SUPRINTENDING ENGINEER OPERATION
Circle Kurukshetra, UHBVNL
Kurukshetra
(Haryana)
3. THE SDO, OPERATION SUB DIVISION
Ladwa, UHBVNL
Kurukshetra
(Haryana)
...........Respondent(s)

BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. ANUPAM DASGUPTA, PRESIDING MEMBER

For the Petitioner :MR. ARVIND KUMAR GOEL
For the Respondent :MR. ALOK SANGWAN (All R.)

Dated : 11 Feb 2011
ORDER

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states, under instructions, that the petitioner is ready to submit to the jurisdiction of the Arbitrator who had to be appointed pursuant to the direction of the relevant Civil Court quite some years ago.  He adds that despite the complainant/petitioner having applied formally to the respondent Nigam, appropriate action to appoint the Arbitrator has yet to be taken by the latter.  Learned counsel for the Nigam, on the other hand, accepts that the Nigam would take expeditious steps to appoint the Arbitrator so that the arbitration proceedings can be completed without further loss of time.

 

 

In view of the foregoing, the respondent is directed to appoint the Arbitrator under the relevant provisions of the Electricity Supply Act within two weeks from today.  The Arbitrator so named shall also take all possible steps to pass his award within three months thereof.  If dissatisfied with the award, parties shall be at liberty to pursue their remedies in accordance with law.

Both the revision petitions are disposed of in the foregoing terms.

 

 

 

 
......................
ANUPAM DASGUPTA
PRESIDING MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.