Haryana

Panipat

EA/14/1

Amit - Complainant(s)

Versus

Utter Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigham Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. B.R.Tyagi

21 Sep 2016

ORDER

DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL FORUM
PANIPAT
 
Execution Application No. EA/14/1
In
303/2011
 
1. Amit
Son of Sh. Balbir Singh R/o H.No. 36, Vill. Adhchini, New Delhi, through its Special Power of Attorney Sh. Balraj Singh son of Sh. Tara Chanc R/o V. Ugrakheri Teh. and Distt. Panipat
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Utter Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigham Ltd.
Through its Managing Director, Having head office at Shakti Bhawan, Sector-6, Panchkula.
2. Executive Engineer, Utter Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigham Ltd.
Samalkha
Panipat
Haryana
3. Sub Divisional officer
Sub Division, UHBVNL, Vill. Chhajpur, Tehsil Panipat
Panipat
Haryana
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. SUMEER SINGH PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MR. Samarjeet Singh Samran MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
Sh. V.K. Manuja Advocate for the Decree Holder.
 
For the Respondent:
Sh. Rajnish Dahiya Advocate for the JDs.
 
Dated : 21 Sep 2016
Final Order / Judgement

We have heard the learned counsel for the parties and have gone through the case file very carefully.

2.            Vide order dated 16/11/2012 the direction was given to the OPs to shift the tubewell connection of the complainant subject to condition that as per rules and regulations of the Nigam any amount is to be deposited by the complainant, the complainant shall deposit the same and the OPs shall shift the tubewell connection of the complainant.

3.            Sh. Ashwani Kaushik, SDO concerned has filed his affidavit dated 09/09/2016 in compliance of order of this Forum dated 16/11/2012 during the execution proceedings further stating that demand notice dated 25/06/2014 and 17/07/2014 have been sent to the Decree Holder to deposit the estimated amount, but the Decree Holder has filed to deposit the required amount. When the Decree Holder is not depositing the estimated amount with the JDs, the JDs cannot be said to be at fault and as such no action is required to be taken by this Forum. Therefore, the present execution petition is hereby dismissed. The parties concerned be communicated to the order accordingly and the file consigned to the record room after due compliance.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. SUMEER SINGH]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MR. Samarjeet Singh Samran]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.