18-07-2014: Heard learned counsel for the appellant and perused the record.

This appeal has been preferred against the order dated 09.07.2014 passed by the District Forum, Nainital in execution application No. 30 of 2011. The original judgment and order dated 30.06.2011 passed by the District Forum. Nainital in consumer complaint No. 80 of 2007 has not been challenged by the appellant in any manner. The appellant moved the execution application and the impugned order was passed by the District Forum in the execution proceedings.

The learned counsel for the appellant has tried to invite our attention towards the judgment and order dated 30.06.2011, which was not challenged by the appellant and, as scuh, became final. We are not supposed to interfere in the merit of the case in the execution proceedings.

We do not find any infirmity in the impugned order passed by the District Forum and the same is fit to be confirmed. Accordingly, the appeal lacks merit and is hereby dismissed in limine.