Uttarakhand

StateCommission

A/14/26

Liyakat Ali - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Mr. R.S. Negi

17 Jan 2018

ORDER

STATE CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION,UTTARAKHAND
176 Ajabpur Kalan,Mothrowala Road,
Dehradun-248121
Final Order
 
First Appeal No. A/14/26
(Arisen out of Order Dated 27/01/2014 in Case No. 334/2012 of District Haridwar)
 
1. Liyakat Ali
Father of Tufel Ahmed r/o Vill. Naseerpur Kalan,Haridwar.
Haridwar
Uttarkhand
...........Appellant(s)
Versus
1. Uttarakhand Power Corporation Ltd.
through Ex. Engg.Electricity Distibution Division,Haridwar
Haridwar
Uttarkhand
...........Respondent(s)
 
BEFORE: 
 HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. Verma PRESIDENT
 HON'BLE MRS. Veena Sharma MEMBER
 
For the Appellant:
For the Respondent:
Dated : 17 Jan 2018
Final Order / Judgement

An application has been moved by Sh. S.M. Jain, learned counsel for respondent – Uttarakhand Power Corporation Limited, stating therein that on the basis of the application dated 13.02.2012 moved by the appellant, an inquiry was conducted by the respondent and based on the findings of the inquiry, the respondent prepared the permanent disconnection report dated 02.07.2014, in which dues after May, 2000 amounting to Rs. 4,11,139/- have been waived and the dues upto May, 2000 amounting to Rs. 1,20,778/- have been demanded from the appellant vide office memorandum No. 670 dated 27.01.2014 and the recovery certificate dated 01.02.2014 has been issued for the permanent disconnection amount.  It has been prayed that thus, the consumer complaint as well as present appeal have become infructuous and the appeal is liable to be dismissed as such.

Sh. Ram Singh Negi, Advocate is present on behalf of the appellant.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

The present appeal was preferred against the order dated 27.01.2014 passed by the District Forum, Haridwar in consumer complaint No. 334 of 2012, whereby the consumer complaint filed by the appellant – complainant was dismissed.

We have perused the impugned order dated 27.01.2014 passed by the District Forum.  The grievance of the appellant – complainant was that on account of storm, which occurred on 30.05.2000, the electricity poles as well as electricity lines were damaged and the electricity line of the complainant was not set right by the electricity department.  It was prayed that the electricity dues of the complainant after May, 2000, be set aside.

Since the electricity department has made necessary inquiry and has waived the dues of the complainant after May, 2000 and has corrected the demand vide office memorandum No. 670 dated 27.01.2014, therefore, the grievance of the appellant – complainant stands resolved.

In view of above, the appeal has got no force and is hereby accordingly dismissed.

 
 
[HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE B.S. Verma]
PRESIDENT
 
[HON'BLE MRS. Veena Sharma]
MEMBER

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.