Haryana

Panipat

CC/21/135

Sumit Jain - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. - Opp.Party(s)

Sh. D.D. Sharma

23 Jun 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/21/135
( Date of Filing : 30 Apr 2021 )
 
1. Sumit Jain
Aged 40 years S/o Sh. Satish Chand Jain R/o 385, Sector-14, Sonepat at present Resident of H.No. 1223, Sector-14 Sonepat, Aadhaar no. 645601805741.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.
Through its Managing Director, Shakti Bhawan/Vidyat Sadan, Plot no. C-16 sector-6, Panchkula Haryana-134109.
2. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.
Through its S.D.O., P-12, Model Town, Panipat Division City, Panipat.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. J.R. Chauhan PRESIDENT
  Smt. Anita Dahiya MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri D.D. Sharma, Advocate for complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Shri Ravinder Kumar, Advocate for the respondents/opposite parties.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 23 Jun 2023
Final Order / Judgement

No evidence of complainant is present. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 18.05.2022 and today is 4th last opportunity on payment of costs Rs.500/-. Even cost has not been paid by the complainant and no efforts has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed more than seven effective opportunities including last opportunity. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               This complaint has been filed against the respondents directing them to correct the electricity bill and to pay Rs.23,03,994/- as compensation on account of mental pain and agony. In written statement, it is submitted that Audit Party during Audit traced the amount on the consumer and a bill for Rs.33,57,087/- was issued on 28.06.2021 as last bill of Rs.255712/- was deposited by the consumer on 06.02.2019. In this way, the bill of electricity amount Rs.33,57,087/- was outstanding towards the consumer. The respondents denied all the other allegations of the complaint and dismissal of the complaint was prayed for.

3.                As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence. However, both the parties are left to bear their own costs.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the record-room. 

 
 
[ Dr. J.R. Chauhan]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Smt. Anita Dahiya]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.