Dayanand             Vs.          S.D.O., UHBVNL

Present:       Sh. Sushil Sardana, Advocate for complainant.

                   Sh. Sanjay Hooda, Advocate for opposite party.                            

                   Today the case is fixed for arguments. At this stage, learned counsel for the complainant has made a statement that due to some technical defects, he does not want to proceed with the present complaint and as such has stated to withdraw the same and has sought permission to file the case afresh in appropriate court and benefit u/s 14(2) of Limitation Act. Statement has been recorded separately.

                   In view of the above statement present complaint stands dismissed as withdrawn. The complainant is at liberty to seek the remedy in appropriate Court of law. Original documents if any placed on record by the complainant/both the parties be returned and photocopy of the same be placed on record. However, the complainant may seek exemption/condonation of delay under section 14 (2) of the Limitation Act for the period during which the proceedings remained pending before this Consumer Forum.

                   File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

                                      Member                                   President/26.02.2019