Haryana

Karnal

CC/22/2022

Sudesh Sharma - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Satish Kumar

02 Aug 2023

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.22 of 2022

                                                          Date of instt.13.01.2022

                                                          Date of Decision:02.08.2023

Sudesh Sharma widow of late Sh. Som Parkash resident of E-15 School Cum Canal Area, Nilokheri District Karnal.

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijali Vitran Nigam Limited, Sub Division, Nilokheri, Karnal through its SDO Karnal.

                        ....Opposite party.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

               

Present:  None for the complainant.

       Sh. Amit Kumar Kamboj, counsel for the OP.

                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant, subject to the last opportunity. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. It is already 04:00 PM. No wait is justified.

                A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OP on 11.03.2022 and the case was adjourned for evidence of complainant. Thereafter, the complainant has availed several effective opportunities including last opportunity for leading her evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint.

                Learned counsel for the OP submitted that the complainant taking the undue benefit of the ad-interim injunction granted by this Hon’ble Commission vide order dated 15.02.2022.

                Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission.

                Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed for want of prosecution. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action in the court of competent jurisdiction, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Announced
Dated:02.08.2023.            

                     President,       

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member