Haryana

Karnal

CC/470/2020

Randhir Singh - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited - Opp.Party(s)

V.K. Kapoor

03 Aug 2022

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

 

                                                                    Complaint No.470 of 2020

                                                                     Date of instt. 30.10.2020

                                                                     Date of Decision:03.08.2022

 

Randhir Singh son of Sh. Pritam Singh resident of village Bajida road, dera Kachhwa, district Karnal.

…….Complainant

                                                Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd. through SDO (OP) Taraori, district Karnal.

…..Opposite party.

 

Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

        Smt. Dr. Rekha Chaudhary……..Member.

 

Present:  Sh. V.K.Kapoor, counsel for the complainant.

                Sh. Virender Sachdeva, counsel for the OP.

                                                         

                    Today the case is fixed for arguments.

                At this stage, learned counsel for the complainant suffered his separate statement to the effect that he does not want to pursue with the present complaint and withdraw the same on technical defect and sought permission to file afresh on the same cause of action before the competent Court of law.              

   In view of statement of learned counsel for complainant, the present complaint is hereby dismissed as withdrawn. However, the complainant is at liberty to file afresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. The original documents annexed with the complaint, if any, be returned to the complainant by placing on record photocopies thereof. In view of the law laid down Hon’ble Supreme Court in Laxmi Engineering Works Vs PSG Industries Institute (1995) 3 SCC 583 the complainant would be at liberty to get the benefit of provisions of Section 14 of the Limitation Act, to exclude the period spent in prosecuting the present complaint before this Commission while computing the period of limitation prescribed for filing such competent Court of law. File be consigned to the record room after due compliance.

Announced
Dated:03.08.2022     

         President, 

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

 

(Vineet Kaushik)   (Dr. Rekha Chaudhary) 

  Member                Member