Haryana

Karnal

CC/82/2023

Krishan Pal - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Ram Kumar Kashyap

19 Jul 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION, KARNAL.

                                                          Complaint.No.82 of 2023

                                                          Date of instt.31.01.2023

                                                          Date of Decision:19.07.2024

 

Krishan Pal son of Shri Atar Singh, resident of Village Andhera, Nagla Megha, District Karnal.

 

          ...…Complainant.

                                        Versus

1.     Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Sector-6, Shakti Bhawan, Panchkula, through its Managing Director.

2.     S.E. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Sector-12, Karnal.

3.     Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited, Sub Division, Meerut Road, Karnal, through its Sub Divisional Officer.

                        ....Opposite parties.

  Complaint under Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

Before    Sh. Jaswant Singh………President. 

                Sh. Vineet Kaushik……… Member.

                Mrs.Sarvjeet Kaur…………Member

 

                               

Present:   None for the Complainant.

                Shri Bhanu Partap Singh, counsel for the OPs.

                                                         

               Today the case is fixed for evidence of the complainant as well as for consideration on the stay application, subject to third last opportunities. No evidence is present. None has put in appearance on behalf of complainant. Case called several times since morning but none has put into appearance on behalf of the complainant. The position remained the same from the last two adjourned dates. It is already 03:30 PM. No further wait is justified.

                   A careful perusal of the file reveals that in the present complaint, the written version has been filed by the OPs on 18.04.2023. The complainant has availed several effective opportunities for leading his evidence but the complainant has failed to conclude the same. It appears that the complainant is no more interested to pursue the present complaint. Further adjournment for the same purpose would not be justified as it would amount to wastage of precious time of this Commission and would cause harassment to the OPs.

                   Hence, in view the above facts, the present complaint is hereby dismissed. However, complainant is at liberty to file fresh complaint on the same cause of action, if so desired. Parties concerned be communicated of the order accordingly and file be consigned to the record room.

Dated:19.07.2024.            

                         President,

District Consumer Disputes

Redressal Commission, Karnal.

(Vineet Kaushik)       (Saravjeet Kaur) 

    Member                     Member