Haryana

Panipat

CC/76/2023

Jaidesh alias Jaidev - Complainant(s)

Versus

Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited - Opp.Party(s)

Shri Vikram Singh

05 Apr 2024

ORDER

BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL COMMISSION
PANIPAT
 
Complaint Case No. CC/76/2023
( Date of Filing : 01 Mar 2023 )
 
1. Jaidesh alias Jaidev
S/o Sh. Jai Bhagwan, Age 32 years R/o House No. 21, Gali No.3, Raj Nagar, Panipat. Aadhar No.9926 1836 9020.
...........Complainant(s)
Versus
1. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Limited
Regd. Office C-16, Vidhyut Sadan, Sector-6, Panchkula-134109, through its Director/ Chairman.
2. S.E. U.H.B.V.N.L.
Gohana Road, Panipat.
3. U.H.B.V.N.L.
through its XEN, P-14, Sub-Urban, Panipat.
4. U.H.B.V.N.L.
through its S.D.O. P-14, Sub Urban, Panipat.
............Opp.Party(s)
 
BEFORE: 
  Dr. R. K. Dogra PRESIDENT
  Dr. Rekha Chaudhary MEMBER
 
PRESENT:
Shri Vikram Singh Dhull, Advocate for complainant.
......for the Complainant
 
Shri Sandeep Singh, Advocate for Respondents/opposite parties.
......for the Opp. Party
Dated : 05 Apr 2024
Final Order / Judgement

                    No evidence of complainant is present despite last opportunity. This case is continuing for evidence of the complainant from 04.05.2023 and today is last opportunity on payment of costs Rs.500/-. Even cost has not been paid by the complainant and no efforts has been made by the complainant to produce the evidence. Moreso, the complainant has already availed six effective opportunities including last opportunity. Hence, there are no sufficient grounds for adjourning this case for the purpose of the evidence of the complainant. Hence, the evidence of the complainant is hereby closed by order of this Commission.

 2.               This complaint has been filed against the respondents directing them to correct the electricity bill and refund the amount of Rs.49,920/- dated and to pay Rs.2,00,000/- as compensation along-with Rs.22,000/- as litigation expenses. In written statement, opposite parties has denied the allegations of the complainant and prayed for dismissal of complaint.

3.                As the complainant has come before this Commission for seeking relief, the onus was on the complainant to prove his case by adducing cogent and convincing evidence. Since the complainant has not produced any evidence on record despite several effective opportunities as stated above and hence, there is no iota of evidence on record to substantiate the allegations of the complaint. Hence, the present complaint is hereby dismissed in lacking of evidence.

4.                This order be communicated to the parties free of costs and file be consigned to the records after due compliance. 

 
 
[ Dr. R. K. Dogra]
PRESIDENT
 
 
[ Dr. Rekha Chaudhary]
MEMBER
 

Consumer Court Lawyer

Best Law Firm for all your Consumer Court related cases.

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!
5.0 (615)

Bhanu Pratap

Featured Recomended
Highly recommended!

Experties

Consumer Court | Cheque Bounce | Civil Cases | Criminal Cases | Matrimonial Disputes

Phone Number

7982270319

Dedicated team of best lawyers for all your legal queries. Our lawyers can help you for you Consumer Court related cases at very affordable fee.